The last to know
A bomb exploding near a mosque in the Indian town of Malegaon killed 25, according to the Telegraph.
Explosions in the western Indian state of Maharashtra have left dozens of people killed or injured. One of the blasts was at a mosque and another targeted a Muslim graveyard, sparking fears that they are revenge for the Bombay train bombings in July. Muslim extremists with links to Pakistan were widely blamed for the July bombings, which killed 186 people. ...
Indian TV is reporting that at least 25 people have been killed, but police have only confirmed five deaths. More than 100 people are reported to have been injured. The mosque explosion came as Muslims celebrated the festival of Shabe Barat, or the Night of Fortune, when they hold night-long prayers seeking divine blessings, exchange sweets with neighbours and relatives, and set off fireworks. Malegaon has a history of religious violence, and it is understood that police riot squads are being rushed to the area to keep control.
A 2001 report from the People's Union for Civil Liberties describes one clash between Hindus and Muslims in Malegaon as sparked by the US campaign against the Taliban, interestingly enough. The report may or may not be biased, but it illustrates the bad blood between local religious factions quite vividly.
Out of Malegaon's population of 6.5 lakhs, over 70 per cent are Muslims. On October 19, Mr. Nihal Ahmed, a former MLA, had led a morcha to protest the U.S. bombing of Afghanistan. The processionists were arrested, but later released. After the Friday prayers on October 26 afternoon, when people were coming out of the Jama Masjid, a man started distributing pamphlets in Urdu titled "Be Indian, Buy Indian", which called for a boycott of American and British products to protest the bombings. A State Reserve Police constable grabbed a pamphlet, tore it up and assaulted the man and dragged him towards the police van.
More police action followed and no sooner had the Muslim crowd been dispersed when another gathering, apparently consisting of Hindus, appeared on the scene.
The committee said it was reported that no sooner had the crowd been chased out of the Jama Masjid area that a huge group headed by leaders of the Shiv Sena-spawned Jaanta Raja Mitra Mandal arrived and staged a demonstration to protest the damaging of the Navaratri pandal. Soon thereafter, this crowd moved towards the Sangameshwar Masjid, destroying shops in front of it. The numbers swelled as it went along leaving a trail of selective destruction in their path, the report said.
Some time later both sides fell to.
From Friday evening through Saturday to Sunday, Hindu and Muslim mobs went on the rampage burning and looting shops, industrial units, powerlooms and vehicles belonging to the other community. The police opened fire yet again on Friday night in the Azad Nagar area. They claim they were challenged by a stone- throwing mob of Muslims. Two young men were killed. On Sunday, October 28, the police opened fire near the Mira Datar Dargah to disperse a mob, killing two men. All those killed in police firing were Muslims. The police and everyone the team spoke to admitted that most of the property destroyed belonged to Muslims. Apart from those killed in police firing, two persons, a Hindu and a Muslim, were murdered in the riots.
Interestingly enough, Harvard University published a detailed study of the social composition and tensions of Malegaon in 1999. The study highlights the fact that Muslims have been growing as a percentage of population in India relative to other religions both before and after Partition. Malegaon is no exception and this may be contributing to the tension. The Muslims in Malegaon are characterized as "a homogenous population who are mainly engaged in the low-income occupation of weaving. Their housing characteristics, possession of consumer durable and per capital income, all suggest a low level of economic development. Even though literacy levels are relatively high, educational levels are low." The study concludes that "therefore, it is recommended that general socioeconomic developmental programme to uplift the Muslim community should be undertaken." One of the suggestions of the study is that birth-control be encouraged among Muslims in Malegaon. Anyone who thinks the US military is tone deaf has yet to read an NGO report. It is easy to see how the tinderbox of grievances on both sides could be sparked by that single recommendation. The non-Muslims would be threatened by the demographic ascent of the Muslims; while the Muslims would naturally view efforts to encourage birth-control as an attempt to keep their numbers down. Add the attack on the Taliban and the bombing of Mumbai into the brew and look out.
Census |
Year |
Hindus |
Muslims |
Tribal |
Christian |
Sikh |
Buddhist |
Jain |
Parsi |
1881 |
75.09 |
19.97 |
2.57 |
0.71 |
0.74 |
0.07 |
0.49 |
0.034 |
0.005 |
1891 |
74.24 |
20.41 |
3.26 |
0.77 |
0.68 |
0.09 |
0.51 |
0.032 |
0.008 |
1901 |
72.87 |
21.00 |
2.88 |
0.98 |
0.77 |
0.10 |
0.47 |
0.033 |
0.008 |
1911 |
71.68 |
22.39 |
3.17 |
1.21 |
1.00 |
0.11 |
0.41 |
0.033 |
0.007 |
1921 |
70.73 |
23.23 |
2.97 |
1.47 |
1.06 |
0.12 |
0.39 |
0.033 |
0.007 |
1931 |
70.67 |
23.49 |
2.26 |
1.77 |
1.28 |
0.13 |
0.37 |
0.032 |
0.007 |
1941 |
69.46 |
24.28 |
2.26 |
1.91 |
1.46 |
0.12 |
0.37 |
0.032 |
0.006 |
Census |
Year |
Hindus |
Muslims |
Christian |
Sikh |
Buddhist |
1951 |
84.99 |
9.93 |
2.30 |
1.74 |
0.06 |
0.45 |
1961 |
83.51 |
10.70 |
2.44 |
1.79 |
0.73 |
0.46 |
1971 |
82.72 |
11.21 |
2.60 |
1.89 |
0.70 |
0.47 |
1981 |
82.64 |
11.35 |
2.43 |
1.96 |
0.71 |
0.48 |
1991 |
82.00 |
12.12 |
2.34 |
1.94 |
0.76 |
0.40 |
Commentary
Anyone who thinks that the current world tensions were somehow caused by GWB and a bunch of neocons ignores the longer-term factors at his peril. The tensions between the Islamic and the non-Islamic world are rooted in many things: religion, education, demographics and history, some of which interrelate in obvious ways. For example in Melegaon, religious factors could cause low levels of education, especially in women, which could in turn lead to poverty, which for its part is a reliable precursor to high fertility. Or maybe the arrow of causality goes the other way around with high fertility driving poverty which in turn creates a yearning for an apocalyptic religion. However the sociology may, be it's reasonable to think that the current world crisis predated November 2000 when George W. Bush was elected. The tectonic plates had been shifting for some time. September 11 was simply the date when the ground gave beneath Manhattan.
Now that the Left has committed itself to resolving what Samuel Huntington called the Clash of Civilizations through the simplistic formula of electing a Democrat to the White House and withdrawing from history -- beginning with Iraq -- the factors underlying a world tragedy are safe from discovery for at least another decade. Impoverished Muslims will continue to pour into Europe and incubate themselves in veritable hothouses of resentment. And all over the Third World, from Saharan and Sub-Saharan Africa to the Indian subcontinent; from Central Asia to the Malay Archipelago, men driven to despair by poverty and humiliation will turn to their religion to explain their failure. From the pulpits beneath the minarets the reverend fingers will be raised to the infidel neighbor before being lowered to trace out line after fiery line in the Sacred Koran. But events like the mosque bombing in Malegaon warn that problems which sophisticates find unworthy of address may still provoke Third world indigenes and First World skinheads to the atavistic response of the axe handle, molotov cocktail and high explosive. Those who argue that bringing democracy and prosperity to the Islamic world is a fool's errand should consider the alternative. Theodore Dalrymple illustrates what that alternative is through an incident which happened last month in the heart of Western Europe:
British passengers on a flight from Malaga to Manchester did a little impromptu terrorist profiling recently. Some already on the aircraft got off, while those waiting to get on refused to do so, until the flight crew removed from the plane two apparently South Asian young men who seemed to be talking Arabic. ... Astonishingly, the passengers got their way: the two men had to get off the flight. Presumably, they flew on the next flight, but one can easily imagine their feelings. Unfortunately, it is unlikely that the experience would make them less rather than more receptive to the siren song of extremism. ... Far lesser things have maddened men. Ill-treated, they will blame the passengers for it, not the men who created the atmosphere that prompts such ill-treatment. ...
The Islamists will use the episode to dramatize not the consequences of what they themselves preach but rather the West’s insuperable prejudice against Muslims. The extremists want a polarized world with a fight to the finish ... This was a small twist in the downward spiral toward such a possible apocalypse, for which the pusillanimity of the government and Muslim tolerance of extremism will be as responsible as the extremists themselves.
But in fairness to the extremists, the pusillanimous have a script of their own to which they will stick at all costs. The Boston Globe reports:
Amid pressure from Democrats, Scholastic Corp. yesterday backed off its plans to distribute learning guides to schools in conjunction with a controversial "docudrama" that is set to air on ABC this weekend. The made-for-TV movie, "The Path to 9/11," has prompted howls from Democrats who argue that ABC is engaging in a partisan attack by airing a film that fictionalizes events to portray President Bill Clinton and his top aides failing to take action to eliminate Osama bin Laden during the 1990s. The study guide Scholastic produced and posted on its website for high school students included several politically explosive statements, including a suggestion that former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had a role in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Scholastic issued a statement yesterday saying it was removing the materials from its website. Instead, the children's publishing company said it will produce and distribute a new discussion guide that "will focus more specifically on media literacy, critical thinking, and historical background."
One decade more.
53 Comments:
Wretchard, I'm curios as to why you immediately close off past thread as soon as a new one is posted. I had composed the below reply while it was possible to post but during that time you disabled comments. Now I stick it here and clutter this thread...
-----------
cedarford, Congress using the purse strings to influence the judiciary is kind of like using a nuke to kill a single terrorist. Why not just amend the constitution?
Exheldrvr, you object to my referencing using torture only on brown people. Well, who is it that qualifies for torture? Everyone, US citizens and all or is there some sort of line to be drawn on who qualify for this 'coercive interrogation treatment'. Do you all really want a totalitarian state where evidence is held in secret and the accused is allowed no knowledge of what the evidence is? Do you want to be convicted by hearsay evidence you cannot challenge, or even be aware of, obtained by coercive means? If someone alleges you took part in a conspiracy to commit war crimes you could be convicted even though you took no concrete steps toward do those actions. You have been accused by someone of a 'thought' crime and you can't challenge it. This is appalling. Is this fantasy on my part? No, this is what Bush wants Congress to enact, and if they do and the courts strike it down, well Cedarford thinks Congress should pull some financial strings. Amerika, the new totalitarian state.
The draft legislation sent to Congress by the White House includes many of the same controversial provisions featured in the commission rules struck down by the Supreme Court two months ago. Chief among them is a rule that would allow a defendant to be barred from parts of his trial dealing with classified evidence. Although he would continue to be represented in court by a military-appointed defense attorney, the lawyer would be ordered not to reveal the content of the classified evidence to his or her client.
Administration officials say the measure is necessary to protect sensitive intelligence sources and methods during the ongoing war on terror. Critics say it undermines defense efforts and raises fair trial questions by excluding the one individual from the courtroom in the best position to effectively confront the evidence against him.
The administration's military commission bill also allows for the introduction of hearsay evidence and evidence obtained through coercive interrogations, though not torture. And it allows prosecutors to file broad conspiracy charges covering alleged agreements to engage in war crimes, rather than requiring prosecutors to overcome the tougher challenge of proving a defendant took concrete steps toward committing specific atrocities.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Ash,
Whether or not Congress approves the draft remains to be seen. If it does then the deed itself will be more significant than the bill. While I don't share your characterization of it as "using a nuke to kill a single terrorist" anytime someone, particularly Congress is willing to do that, then one had better ask why.
This current post really asks: who is out of step? It also asks who is being tortured? And the answer to the second question at least is "brown men" as you put it, largely by other "brown men". The last to know.
wretchard wrote:
The made-for-TV movie, "The Path to 9/11," has prompted howls from Democrats who argue that ABC is engaging in a partisan attack by airing a film that fictionalizes events to portray President Bill Clinton and his top aides failing to take action to eliminate Osama bin Laden during the 1990s.
This attempt at censorship is for Hillary and her 2008 run. She remembers the boos and catcalls she got from folks in the near-immediate aftermath of the WTC bombing.
Here is an interesting item, more related to the previous thread.
According to Mosnews.com, Human Rights Watch is critcising the U.S. for having released some Russians from Gitmo in 2004. It seems that after finding we had no need to detain the Russians who had been captured in Afghanistan, they were sent back to Russia where they were allegedly tortured - although apparently they are not presently in Russian custody.
So, we lock'em up and Human Rights Watch does not like it. And we let them go and Human Rights Watch does not like it - says we have to be careful where we send them to.
Pakistani’s radicals seem to be fulfilling a world-wide mission at the beck and calling of the Saudi funded madrassas. I hearken back to Wretchard’s guest host who said, essentially that the Jihadi’s were burning their boats upon the shore so that there would no way back, only utter victory or utter defeat. When such a conflict fully evolves a state like India, 800 some odd humans, it will be interesting and potentially brutal.
Ash, if posters like you who don't know the meaning of the word "terse" didn't take up so much space with your wordiness, maybe comments wouldn't have to be closed.
Ash,
So you are the one advocating torture as acceptable as long as it is a minority? Interesting.
I advocate torture as appropriate regardless of the skin color or ethnicity, if the potential payoff is worth the cost to the torturers and the potential long-term cost in the public relations aspects of this war.
There is going to be a lot more backlash against Muslims worldwide if they don't stop their tacit support of the "radical element." (Quotes to indicate that I'm unsure if it is really radical, per se, or just the violent aspect of the mainstream.)
Ash, please be more consistent; don't strum the race string and then close with "Amerika, the new totalitarian state".
You should include the theme-word "racist"--as in "Amerika, the *racist* totalitarian state" (dropping the word "new", as it is inconsistent with our long history of totalitarian racism).
Wondering, will you be attending the Khatami speaking events this weekend?
wretchard quoted Dalrymple:
"The Islamists will use the episode to dramatize not the consequences of what they themselves preach but rather the West’s insuperable prejudice against Muslims. The extremists want a polarized world with a fight to the finish ..."
Ironically, the ones who oppose the extremists also want a polarized world. When the suggestion is made that both sides have barbaric scriptures or resort to torture or the slaughter of civilians, thus making the whole mess a gray goo, this is called being "too PC"
It might be gray goo if either side could halt hostilities without a cultural capitulation (but only the jihad side 'can').
It might be gray goo if neither side was an aggressor (but the jihad 'is').
Buddy, shall I do an internet search on "gray goo" or just speculate?
Normally your comments are crystal clear in their meaning...
The gray goo is the color and texture of the in cranial contents that seems to get smeared around when bullets fly and bombs go off. The question is who's gray goo gets spread around and how many innocents foriegn and domestic get pulled into the inevitable downward spiral of violence. Chemo-therapy is a dangerous concoction that kills the foreign invader through sucessive applications or until it kills it's host. That it be applied with some discretion is a topic of heated debate.
For what it's worth (probably not much more than trivia), I believe Maharashtra is the Indian state in which the infamous Dahbol power plant (probably Enron's most prominent international failed venture) is located.
ilia capitolina wrote:
It's a gay goo only if someone believes that "there is no such thing as an evil worldview, only evil actions."
That concept is something I learned on Belmont Club itself recently, when I pointed out that there were a number of instances in the Hebrew bible where the death penalty is mandated for homosexuals or for adultery. I was told in no uncertain terms (and with a variety of personal attacks to boot) that the Hebrew bible could not be considered an evil ideology because today we do not put those death penalties into practice.
The Soviet Union thought open and unapologetic belligerence was the way to go, and through its intransigence forced the entire industrialized world to collectivize against it. No small feat, that. Even an ideological ally like China was eventually pried away because of the Kremlin's imperial hubris. The world united behind the simple concept of containing the Russians. And the Empire fell.
The mutualist feedback dynamic between Islamic extremism and Islamophobia (for lack of a better term) is leading us to an equally polarized world. It seems inevitable now: the non-Muslim world will unite behind the simple concept of resisting Islam, and Islam will unite behind the simple concept of being resisted.
No matter how you cut it, this is going to end badly for Islam.
Considering that common practices invariably answer a felt practical need, then ancient tribes living perpetually on the unpredictable edge of extinction, without layers of security within which to absorb individual challenges to the community standard, probably saw evil far less metaphorically/abstractly than we do now.
If I read the charts correctly, since 1951 the Hindu population had increased from 9.93 to 12.12 and the muslims from 2.30 to 2.30.
But your text says: "The study highlights the fact that Muslims have been growing as a percentage of population in India relative to other religions both before and after Partition. Malegaon is no exception and this may be contributing to the tension."
Am I reading this wrong or was there a mistake?
From today's Washington Post:
Body Count in Baghdad Nearly Triples
Morgue's Revised Toll for August Undermines Claims by Leaders of Steep Drop in Violence
By Ellen Knickmeyer
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, September 8, 2006; Page A12
BAGHDAD, Sept. 7 -- Baghdad's morgue almost tripled its count for violent deaths in Iraq's capital during August from 550 to 1,536, authorities said Thursday, appearing to erase most of what U.S. generals and Iraqi leaders had touted as evidence of progress in a major security operation to restore order in the capital.
Pardon, here's the link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/07/AR2006090700768.html
"By late August, Maj. Gen. William Caldwell was claiming a 46 percent decrease in the murder rate in Baghdad for that month. "We are actually seeing progress," Caldwell said at the time. A U.S. military Web site on Thursday continued to assert a roughly 50 percent drop in killings in Baghdad.
A U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad, Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, said Thursday that the U.S. figures were based on the military's "consolidated reporting with the Iraqi government." Johnson also disclosed that the military's numbers included only "individuals targeted as a result of sectarian-related violence, to include executions," and did not include "other violent acts such as car bombs and mortars."
Johnson said he did not track the morgue's figures and could not account for the substantial gap between the military's count for August killings and the latest figures from Baghdad's morgue."
Oh Ho! So Lt. Col. Johnson forgot to include "car bombs and mortars"? Sloppy. Should we blame the MSM for last month's false optimism?
Teresita still has problems understanding the lack of moral equivalency between Judeo-Christianity and Islam.
Five things distinguish Christianity from Islam and redeem the former, as not the threat Islam is, in the modern world:
---
See C-4 post above for 5 distinguishing characteristics.
---
Religion is as Religion DOES.
Religion is as Religion DOES
The Peace of Augsburg, in 1555, ended the first wave of religious wars in the Holy Roman Empire, and gave us "cuis regio, eius religio", (whose region, their religion).
(ht, a discussion @ the corner)
qlmogi agree with Doug, but have to run to da plane. Feel free to fill in for me doug, if you think i would agree.
Do a couple 2164th would have saids:
teresita: feel free to misquote me while I am not present.
a strange thing about gray goo: while its advance must always be repelled, its defense can never be worth sacrifice. Hence it has no defenders, thus it must be something other than a philosophy. Perhaps a process?
Wretchard,
Like your new photo by the way. You seem a lot less imposing than your prose.
The cultural problems Wretchard references are often exacerbated by those souls among us who either have never mastered an academic discipline, with entailed intellectual integrity, or purposefully manipulate and mangle information with the intent of creating supposed clever mischief.
For instance, there are those who posit that the Torah is an evil ideology because of the harshness of some mitzvot and, therefore, the Torah is comparable to the Koran. Well, no, it is not. As it turns out, the Torah is applicable only to Jews, as even a cursory reading would prove. That being the case, even if the Torah were to be applied literally to every living Jew today, only 0.25% of the world’s population would be affected. This is to say, 99.75% of the earth's inhabitants would continue on their merry way, unmolested.
The Koran, on the other hand, is understood by Muslims to be the law under which 100% of the world’s people will ultimately be governed. The Koran is universal. Unnumbered millions of Muslims take the Koran literally and, indeed, it serves as the basis of all law throughout the Islamic world, comprising some 1.2 billion adherents. Even the so called secularist Turkey is moving inexorably toward Sharia. It goes without saying that the much of the world is harassed by Muslims.
To illustratively juxtapose the Torah and Koran, consider:
___Nothing within Torah ordered or now orders Jews to rule the world by force of arms. The Koran does so order Muslims.
___Nothing within Torah ordered or now orders Jews to convert all unbelievers. The Koran does so order Muslims.
___Nothing within Torah ordered or now orders Jews to kill or enslave all those resistant to conversion. The Koran does so order Muslims.
Facts are troublesome things, which frequently deflate ignorant agendas, as well as crass egos.
By temperament I consistently fall into the category of those who believe “kill them all, let god sort them out”. But as there is a separation of powers in government there is in my own mind, the faculty to know that this does not mesh well with political reality. There is an inherent duality that exists in all of our minds and it is the crux of eternal argument across the corpus collosium divide.
The West is the beneficiary of a global industrial economic system that has become the “glass house” built upon the supply of oil producing states. Though we might expect these oil producing states to behave financially responsible in the global economic forum the Islamic mind forbids rational actions. Breaking things and killing people is much more ethically complicated when you have your own interests at stake.
Nice to see Allen & C4 on the same side of an argument. Nice, really nice. No sarcasm or foolery intended. I been to a state fair, a rodeo, and a Sunday picnic, and never seen the like of it.
doug said:
Religion is as Religion DOES.
That's what I tried to say before I got smacked down as being a "dope" for not believing there are evil ideologies like Islam even in the absense of expressed evil deeds by most Muslims. Maybe when the Belmont Club settles on a final platform I can try to fit in better.
First ilia capitolina says:
It's a gay goo only if someone believes that "there is no such thing as an evil worldview, only evil actions."
Next ilia says:
The fact there hasn't been any Jewish homosexual put to death in the last 2,000 years (if ever), and that homosexuals openly parade in gay pride parades in Israel, should tell you where philosophically things stand.
So ilia, which one is the operative statement? Islam is an evil worldview even in the absence of barbaric deeds by 90% of Muslims, or Judaism is not an evil worldview due to the absence of barbaric deeds in the last 2,000 years? What am I missing here?
Was struck by it too Buddy.
Will wonders never cease?
Allen & C4's most recent posts, for starters, Tess.
buddy larsen; 01:49:57 PM
re: Ode to Joy
Don't get too comfortable; the day is young.
;-}
LOL--but still one tiny straw in the wind for ole Mohammad to consider--
buddy:
Would that be the Minnesota State Fair?
By far the best in the world.
Question for Cedarford:
“the enemy within has disproportionate numbers of a particular ethnicity” I didn’t know that the “destructive Jewish Left” was an “ethnicity”.
“considering religious Jews not aligned with post-communist subversion of America's institutions and culture a welcome asset to our country.” Are you pro Israel or you would you be if religious Jews were the entire population?
I hope you are pro American though.
Are you suggesting David Horowitz is “Neo-Communist”? Or are you saying he is an agent of the devil? Seems like you are leaning towards the latter:
The devil’s “2nd greatest feat was in convincing the ones who knew that it was hurtful and impermissible to openly discuss their anti-Devil bias." & your
“One-World government led by an enlightened elite”. This last phrase is often used reference “the stage on which the Antichrist will build his one-world government” are you possibly talking about “Illuminism” or the “Jewish Banker Conspiracy”? If not the wording is quite a coincidence.
Ps. I’m just Belmonting you.
Enscout, I'll betcha it is at that--MN being the home of Paul Bunyon and his blue ox Babe--
but, Dallas/Fote Wuth has a helluva one, too--
ilia--you had another, almost equally awe-ful question on the previous thread--you mus' be a Rabbi, wit dese chin-rubbin head-scratchers--
;)
ilia capitolina; 01:26:30 PM
As with all things Jewish, opinions vary. For nearly eighteen hundred years some rabbis have said, “Yes”; some rabbis have said, “No”; and some rabbis have said, “Maybe, so.” Certainly, some number of Jews must agree with your point of view, after all Israel is a secular state, albeit, influenced for better or worse by a growing fundamentalist minority.
For me, I am not prepared to go as far as you; indeed, within the context of basic Judaism, I must struggle daily to perfect myself and the world. To that end I, find the Rambam’s “Thirteen Articles” instructive. For the same inspiration as that of the Rambam, I go to the prophetic hymn of the simple Jewish woman, Hannah; I Samuel 2:1-10. Beyond that, I must rely upon the rabbinic authority of my place of residence, and if I disagree, like any "good" Jew, I will quit listening.
Addressing Wretchard’s lede, as Israel becomes more “Orthodox” through indigenous demographic growth and immigration out of the EU over the next generation, the struggles with the Palestinians et al will become more religious, more intractable, and more draconian. Wise men will see the future as a race to foreclose a religious war. Frankly, I am very pessimistic.
One thing not understood by non-Jews, apparently, is that lawyers have been ever with us. The Law demanded the establishment of courts of judgment, with impaneled judges and advocates. Contrary to some accounts, appeals were possible and common. While dramatic and of propaganda value, people were not dragged kicking and screaming out of the city and summarily stoned. Moreover, no capital punishment was possible absent the sworn testimony of multiple witnesses to a particular event. Capital punishment was made purposefully, extremely difficult to obtain for the prosecution. Additionally, mutilation was forbidden for any crime.
Just saying.
“whit,
You think God will care?”
Someone has!
Sorry to interfere, but you seem too good a soul to let go.
Terisita said:
Islam is an evil worldview even in the absence of barbaric deeds by 90% of Muslims, or Judaism is not an evil worldview due to the absence of barbaric deeds in the last 2,000 years?
How about a "homeview?" It's that 10% (120,000,000) we need to worry about. And, each 1% who support the doers of barbaric deeds means another 12,000,000 to worry about.
Even profiling won't help me to distinguish the guilty from the innocent among the 6-7 million we have here at home; ten percent of whom might be nasty Islamofascists (600,000-700,000).
How many will the latest AQ fatwa stir to action?
ah, yes...the pickled herrrring....
Am I hearing pickles?
ilia capitolina;
re: G-d has striven
To strive, an army under a united command presupposes a commander.
this place is a pinnacle of ecumenical
Doug's Drive-In Coco Nut Cabana?
allen wrote:
"after all Israel is a secular state"
Is it? I'm not trying to be facetious but isn't much of the debate within Israel about maintaining is status a jewish state? Is there not land ownership restrictions upon non-jewish inhabitants? How does this qualify as being a 'secular state'? What does it mean to be a 'secular state'?
Ash said...
allen wrote:
"after all Israel is a secular state"
Is it? I'm not trying to be facetious but isn't much of the debate within Israel about maintaining is status a jewish state? Is there not land ownership restrictions upon non-jewish inhabitants? How does this qualify as being a 'secular state'? What does it mean to be a 'secular state'?
well ash that pissy jewish state just passed laws demanding that charities set up for the purchase of land by the diaspora for jews cannot exclude moslems and christians..
some jewish state, all those jews in america donating thier cash to help thier fellow jews in israel are now forced to have a percentage of the monies given to the arab population of israel
ilia capitolina,
re: legacy media
Sorry, I lost you on another thread.
Your point was well taken, although it did not contemplate the necessity of the concurrent demise of the political elite that is its Siamese twin.
What in the world is a Cuban drive-by? As to the remainder of your comment to buddy, that will be left, for the moment to ugly conjecture. :-)
Wretchard,
re: The Carnival of the Animals
Whenever I think myself a relentless SOB, you come around and put me to shame. Nevertheless, torture has its place. Hmmm... Ms. Greer? No, she too will pass.
Crikey, Love you, man!
While totally, completely, inexcusably off-topic, some things just have to be said:
Yes, dear friends, where there is will there is a way. While American’s warriors fight to bring life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to the unwashed, America’s civilians are doing their part.
Businesses maneuver to buck smoking bans
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060908/ap_on_re_us/smoker_havens
Sex toys contain dangerous chemicals says Greenpeace
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/od_afp/netherlandsenvironment_060908185927
Indeed, as Mama Gov works to protect us, some of her unruly children say, “F*** Off, Bitch.”
Remind me, where are the Taliban, again?
From a later post where no comment is possible"
"Blinded by fanaticism, resistant to pain, possessed of limitless endurance and patience they are supermen at war." (empasis added)
How do you know that? They hide all the time. When they do come out, they do so at night in order to plant remote control explosives. When they make the mistake of coming out in the open, they are slaughtered like the sheep they are.
Explain to me their reason for hiding and it's military superiority. Win by hiding...what a concept! In 500-700 years, after the new Dark Ages that Sharia will usher in, historians will write that the West was defeated by people who engaged in sustained military-grade hiding.
BTW, I have beieved since the beginning that ObL and his Eygptian munchkin homicidal maniac buddy are hidin' in a palace ib the Kingdom...better access to al Jazeera's producers and FedEx service.
Post a Comment
<< Home