Friday, July 14, 2006

The Tony Snow Press Gaggle

Tony addressed a group of journalists in Russia who were following the President, the transcript of which was sent to me by email. Questions were mostly about the Lebanon and a fuzzy outline of the Administration's thinking on its resolution can be glimpsed. The full text follows, the emphasis is mine.


Strelna, Russia 5:47 P.M. (L)

MR. SNOW: Okay, a couple of things. First, you probably heard that at 8:15 a.m. eastern time, U.S. time, a bomb went off outside Karachi. We don’t have a whole lot of details. I think most of it is on the wires already, but three dead, including a Shia cleric. This was near a university. No claims of responsibility. And, as you know, these things take a while to sort themselves out, so we have no comment; we're still trying to figure out what the facts are and we're in consultation.

Today on the plane, the President made some phone calls to foreign leaders regarding the situation in the Middle East. He talked to King Abdullah of Jordan -- I think your recorder just went off. Here's a quick tape pause. (Laughter.) He called king Abdullah of Jordan, they talked for, I don’t know, 12 minutes or so. He also talked to --

Q I'm sorry, how long?

MR. SNOW: About 12 -- these are all approximate, because I didn't look at my watch. But all the calls were between 10 and 12 minutes. The second one was to Hosni Mubarak, and the third was to Prime Minister Siniora of Lebanon. The topics were all the same. He thanked especially King Abdullah and President Mubarak for their help in trying to resolve the situation in the region.

Also expressed some -- he was pleased by a statement -- I don’t know if you've seen it -- that came out yesterday by the Saudis that, among other things, pointed out that Hezbollah, acting independent of a government, had behaved in a manner that I will paraphrase as irresponsible. I would direct you to the Saudi statement because I'm sure I don’t have that exactly right -- as a matter of fact, we actually did a print out of it. Let's see, "uncalculated adventures undertaken by elements in Lebanon without recourse to legal authority and consulting and coordinated with Arab nations."

In other words, what the Saudis were saying is that Hezbollah has been acting in a manner that's completely independent of the state of Lebanon. And we're looking forward to a foreign ministers meeting -- with Arab League Foreign Ministers tomorrow, and hope that their comments will reflect the same concern about Hezbollah's acting independently and thereby imperiling the democracy in Lebanon, which we support.

The President also reiterated his support for the democracy in his conversation with Prime Minister Siniora. They talked about ways to move ahead not only within the Arab League, but also the President encouraging his allies to speak out with everybody involved, including the Syrians and once again made the point that Hezbollah has been granted shelter in Syria, it is financed by Iran and both parties should be held responsible for some of the activities that are going on there.

He also reiterated the statement yesterday, that he believes that the Israelis have a right to protect themselves, and also that we think it's important that in doing that they try to limit as much as possible so-called collateral damage, not only to facilities but also to human lives.

So that is basically it.


Q Now, Siniora is describing the President's comments as promising to get Israeli to rein in its attacks. Did the President say anything like that?

MR. SNOW: No. What the President -- or, the President reiterated his position. Prime Minister Siniora at one point -- I think he's been public about this -- has wanted a ceasefire. It is unlikely that either or both parties are going to agree to that at this juncture, although we certainly hope that we get to a ceasefire soon and we hope that all parties work toward it.

But, again, as the President said, this began because Hezbollah crossed into Israeli territory, kidnapped two soldiers and, furthermore, has been engaged in a long series of rocket attacks on people in Northern Israel, although we have been focusing on it -- that is, "we" collectively, and especially the American press in the last couple of days -- this has been going on for a long time, it just hasn't reported. It's been a much keener and sustained interest in Israel.

The Israelis have decided to try to have targeted attacks against rocket launch sites, many of which are deliberately placed in civilian neighborhoods. And they regret the loss -- or they’ve expressed regret for the loss of innocent life, but they also pointed out that military necessity compels them to hit where the launchers are, but I will let the Israelis speak for themselves on this.

Q Did the President discuss with these leaders a U.N. delegation that's going into the region?

MR. SNOW: Yes. Well, we support the U.N. delegation. It really didn't go much further than that. As you recall from Secretary Rice's comments last night, she was actively engaged in helping put together the initiative and she certainly supports it and encourages it.

But as far as any specific directions, look, we think the United Nations is trying to helpful here, ad that's important, because the more pressure was can bring to bear on Hezbollah -- and there's an important point to note here: the attacks by Hezbollah, which, again, to reiterate -- I'll use the Saudi phrase once again, "without recourse to legal authority and consulting and coordinating with Arab nations" -- it is clear that the Arab nations -- that Saudi Arabia, that the Jordanians, that the Egyptians do not look upon Hezbollah as being a legitimate government entity, as a matter of fact, they look upon it as an active threat to the government of Lebanon.

And U.N. Resolution 1559 made it pretty clear that foreign powers ought to stay out of Lebanon and let the democracy itself take root. And so the United Nations is going there to work with strengthening the provisions of 1559. Prime Minister Siniora also wants help, and we support his aim, in making sure that his government acquires effective control over all Lebanese territory, including the southern regions where, in many places Hezbollah holds sway. And the President certainly offered his support for that goal. And, again, it's consistent with 1559.

Q Following up on something that came up last night with the Condi briefing -- is the President -- is the White House working with the G8 on a draft resolution to address this issue? Because she talked about how important it was to speak with one voice.

MR. SNOW: There were some draft resolutions underway before everybody headed over here. But I think it's safe to say that with the pace of events -- and I did speak to some of the people involved in negotiations -- they're going to have to redraft them. It is certainly going to be a topic of much concern and so I expect them to talk about it a lot. I don’t want to make any promises about draft resolutions, but it is important for everybody to speak one voice.

And I think the one area of common agreement is that Hezbollah cannot act independently of the government of Lebanon. What it has done is deliberately place in peril the people of Lebanon, as well as the government. And the President has also made it absolutely clear that we want that government to survive and thrive and we are going to do what we can to help them do that.

Q So there will be one kind of resolution or another, it's just that they have to be reworked?

MR. SNOW: I can't -- look, I don’t have a crystal ball. We'll just have to see what happens.

Q Okay. There may be resolutions.

MR. SNOW: Well, you don't call it "resolution." I think you have a statement or whatever. But, again, no promises on that; we'll just have to see what happens when the leaders get together.

Q The President didn't make any promises or anything to the Lebanese Prime Minister? Did he give him any idea of what he might try to do with Israel, as far as making them hold back a little bit on attacks?

MR. SNOW: The President is not going to make military decisions for Israel. What he said is that -- look, there have been ongoing conversations. As a matter of fact, today Secretary Rice -- let me pull out my list. I mentioned the three heads of state the President has talked with. Secretary Rice has talked to David Walsh, [sic] she's talked to Kofi Annan, the Qatari foreign minister, she talked to Mahmoud Abbas, she talked to Siniora, and she is working on trying to get -- well, I won't tell you who she's working on getting through to.

Q Who's David Walsh?

MR. SNOW: He's our -- Welch, I'm sorry. Welch. Sorry, can't read my own writing. David Welch.

Q Who is he?

MR. SNOW: He's our Assistant Secretary of State. He is traveling with Eliot Abrams through the region.

Q So the President has not -- you know, Condi last night was talking about Israel should exercise restraint. The President has not called any Israeli officials to make that point?

MR. SNOW: He has not spoken with Israeli officials. However, Secretary Rice and National Security Advisor Hadley have had a number of conversations.

Q Those conversations with the Israelis escalated over the last 24-48 hours or are we talking kind of over this 17-day --

MR. SNOW: Well, of course we've been talking through the 17-day period. But you must understand that what Hezbollah did -- look, there were active negotiations between the Israelis and other partners on the kidnapping. Hezbollah steps in, what, five days ago, six -- whatever. I mean, that is when you get a real escalation point. And the moment that happened, obviously, it became a matter of greater concern because it was pretty obvious that what Hezbollah is trying to do is to destabilize the situation. It has an interest in renewed violence at a time when Arab nations have been speaking out more and more about the importance of a two state solution; they agree with us on that.

And what is heartening to note is that a number of Arab nations are, in fact, saying to Hezbollah, sorry, you're on your own. And, in addition, they've been talking with the government of Syria because it is pretty clear that Syria has considerable influence over what goes on there.

Q Does the President have any plans to talk any Israeli leaders? Or at this point, no?

MR. SNOW: At this point -- look, I think -- the Israeli leaders have been consulted, and they've been consulted by the Secretary of State and the National Security Advisor. And they'll continue their conversations and there is no -- I don’t want to say there's no need, I'd just say the President has not expressed any plans to speak with the Prime Minister, but should it become necessary, he will.

The rest is banter about President Bush's bicycle riding and his scheduled dinner with President Putin.


The main characteristics of the solution being glimpsed are that:

  1. It takes the part of Saudi Arabia in their rivalry with Iran; it plays upon the Kingdom's concern with Hezbollah. It's not that KSA is averse to Bad Guys. Just that Hezbollah are not their Bad Guys.
  2. There is the suggestion that Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the Jordanians are going sit with their hands folded while the IDF beats Hezbollah about the head and shoulders. Until then, a ceasefire is off the table.
  3. A deal will be in place to substitute for the fighting when the Hezbollah has been savaged enough.

It's likely that Iran will try to stir up the "Arab Street". But there seems to be some confidence indicated in the Snow's remarks that Hezbollah has gone out on a limb and sawed itself off.


Blogger Wu Wei said...

Syria says it is in.

Syria will support its allies Hizbollah and Lebanon against Israel's attacks on the country, the ruling Baath Party said on Friday.

"The Syrian people are ready to extend full support to the Lebanese people and their heroic resistance to remain steadfast and confront the barbaric Israeli aggression and its crimes," a communiqu issued by the party's national command said.

7/14/2006 04:27:00 PM  
Blogger wretchard said...

I read Syria's comment, but I'm doubtful if Syria will take on Israel without Egypt and Jordan, who have seemingly told Assad he is on his own.

My own guess is that Assad is making noises for the record by getting his Ba'ath Party hacks to come out with this statement.

7/14/2006 04:35:00 PM  
Blogger Aristides said...

Is not that statement a casus belli for Israeli?

If Israel is still looking to escalate this thing, it sure seems like it has been given ample reason now.

7/14/2006 04:42:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

If the Israeli do not roll up the Bekaa, I'd think the Syrians will watch.
But if the Bekaa becomes the battleground, like the Chinese watching then crossing over the Yalu, Syria would roll. To meet the voming threat.

They'd almost have to.

7/14/2006 04:43:00 PM  
Blogger rufus said...

I would think that the best way, knowing that the Lebanese border area is strewn with powerful, tank-killing IED's, to attack into S Lebanon would be to swing out through the Golan Heights, through W Syria, then back into Lebanon. This avenue seems to be cut off. Rats.

7/14/2006 04:55:00 PM  
Blogger Wu Wei said...

Given what Syria said, I don't see how it could not come in if Hizbollah asked it. Also Iran made a similar statement today, so this could be the big one.

7/14/2006 04:56:00 PM  
Blogger Wu Wei said...

Iran seems to say it would be in if Lebanon wants.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ...

"Attacks by the Zionist regime against its neighbors, notably Lebanon, Syria, and its threats against other countries in the region are due to the fact that this puppet regime cannot live normally," IRNA quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.

"This situation cannot last, and one day the protectors of the Zionist regime -- the US in particular -- will have to explain themselves and be judged by the conscience of humanity," he added.

His comments came after he warned Israel against conducting any attack against Syria -- the Islamic republic's only ally in the region.

"If Israel commits another act of idiocy and aggresses Syria, this will be the same as an aggression against the entire Islamic world and it will receive a stinging response," he said in a telephone conversation with his Syrian counterpart Bashar al-Assad.

"The Israeli aggressions are a result of the weakness of a puppet regime that is on its way towards disappearing," state television quoted him as saying.

The hardline president, famed for calling for Israel to be "wiped off the map", also said the "Zionists and their protectors are the people held in most contempt by humanity" and promised their "rapid downfall."

He told Lebanon's pro-Syrian President Emile Lahoud that "Iran would put all its potential at the service of Lebanon."

"Iran will stay by the side of the Lebanese in the delicate circumstances in their homeland," he said in a separate phone conversation, according to a statement from the Lebanese presidency.

7/14/2006 05:02:00 PM  
Blogger wretchard said...

It was an Iranian supplied UAV which damaged an Israeli warship, according to Haaretz. A Mirsad-1, according to Security Watchtower. According to Haaretz, "the incident occurred at around 8:30 P.M., as the ship was some 16 kilometers from the Lebanese coast".

If true, then Hezbollah has targeting systems which can be strike at over-water targets by night and probably to the limit of the line of sight. The Iranians have planned long and hard for this. They knew what Israel would do. In many ways, it's like the Saggers of 1973. If this is true, Hezbollah may have MANPADs and more.

7/14/2006 05:04:00 PM  
Blogger hdgreene said...

Can a nation long endure half free and half terrorist tyranny? Surely it must soon become all one or all the other.

To save Lebanon means to destroy Hezbollah as a Terrorist entity.

A few years ago I got accustomed to the terrorist organization with the Social Services/free clinic wing. Then they became Humanitarian Organizations with a terrorist/freedom fighter arm -- sort of the Red Cross with suicide vests and ambulances for transporting terrorist to the attack and, if they are wounded, back (on second thought, they don't have to be wounded). You can see the symbiosis there -- create the refugee crisis and then tend their wounds in squalid camps (squalid makes better pictures).

Now we have elected governments where the Ministry of Tourism becomes the Ministry of Terrorism. And apparently, because they are elected, America owes them something "more" even as they rampage.

In fact, when a population votes for terror, it does not mean we owe them something -- it means we owe them nothing.

7/14/2006 05:07:00 PM  
Blogger Wu Wei said...

A missile fired at an Israeli naval vessel off Lebanon early on Saturday missed the target and hit an Egyptian boat instead, the Israeli army said.

"There has been another attempt to attack an Israeli naval vessel. It missed our ship and instead hit a different ship, an Egyptian vessel," an Israeli army spokeswoman said.

7/14/2006 05:08:00 PM  
Blogger Brett L said...


Talk is cheapest from those least accountable. ie Kerry's 'wouldas' on Iraq in the 2004 election have the same real word consequences as a Ba'ath party's statement on Syrian readiness to help out the Hizbollah while Israeli ground forces are not yet in evidence in Lebanon.

I imagine the party line to Nasrallah is something like: "Hold the fort. We'll get there when we can."

Of course, Will Travis found out that time passes differently inside the fort...

7/14/2006 05:11:00 PM  
Blogger bjbarron said...

Is Syria rolls into the Bekaa they will get smashed. I think that Iran will stay out unless the fighting spreads to Syria.

I think the Israelis are in no mood this time for the typical give 'to the Arabs', and take 'bombings as usual'.

Iran is in a terrible spot with US troops on two borders, Arab governments sitting this one out, and the Israelis in their face. Imanutjob's options are limited if no one other than the Israelis want to play.

Probably everyone wishes the proxies would have stayed home.

7/14/2006 05:16:00 PM  
Blogger wretchard said...

I've put a thread up on what was probably a UAV attack on an Israeli warship.

7/14/2006 05:19:00 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Nobody seems to have noticed the big news of this entire affair. Iran has given the U.S. and its EU partners its full and complete answer to Rice's May 30th intitiative. They simply used Hezboallah to provide volume.

I suspect that Rice knows this and this explains Bush's reluctance to rein in the IDF. Why not take this opportunity to take a valuable Pasadaran stooge off the board. As we speak, Israeli artillery, mech infantry, and panzer formations are massing in the Northern Command area preparing for a blitzkrieg of the Hezboallah lands.

I expected Syria to intervene earlier, but if they cannot expect a Saudi or Egyptian second front, the Boy President may not want to go hang himself and lose several hundred of his tanks to the Golani Brigade.

Down the line, the collapse of the Rice initiative was inevitable, given the nature of the regime. I always figured Condi to be playing for time anyway. I figured that Condi was simply trying to get us out of our isolated position and make us look like we were being sweet and reasonable. In fact, she always understood that the Iranians would find a way to hit us first, and they decided to use Hezboallah.

Something else is also happening, I'll warrant. IAF Unit 69 and the U.S. Air Force's 509th Bomb Wing (formerly the 509th Composite Group) are dusting off the approach maps to places like Bashar, Natanz and other points of interest on Iran's Michelin map.

7/14/2006 07:38:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

7/14/2006 08:20:00 PM  
Blogger Boghie said...

I think we are in for a deep right hook...

7/14/2006 08:41:00 PM  
Blogger Boghie said...

Anyone else looking at the maps...

I don't know, but that eastern land appendage in Syria seems invitingly close to the WMD research, production, and launching sites in Iran...

Just a thought.

7/14/2006 08:44:00 PM  
Blogger Tom Grey said...

I think Israel needs a better Public Relations / military goal -- immediate, full enforcement of 1559.

Israel's public goal should be protection of Lebanese democracy, but an immediate end to the threat of Hezbollah military capability.

Meaning some 60 000 fully trained troops whose mission in S. Lebanon is to enforce the dearming of non-gov't forces. Israel should be asking all UN countries for pledges of military force for that purpose, and point out hypocrisy of those who criticise one side, but fail to help.

Perhaps Israel should be pushing Lebanon towards such a "solution". The World needs a "cop", but only the USA has been able to be one, so far.

Finally, the USA should be talking with India, Japan, and Australia, as well as NATO countries, about a huge temporary occupation force for S. Lebanon, to be under the control of the elected Lebanon civilians; requiring Lebanon to actually have a plan on how to forcibly disarm Hez.

7/15/2006 12:32:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Powered by Blogger