Watch closely
Is "Captain Jamil Hussein" the "Professor George Harleigh" of Iraq? Classical Values introduces one fictional source to another in a news landscape that includes phony bombed ambulances, Photoshopped smoke and Green Helmet men who not only live in the news, but never die.
I don't know how many readers remember him, but George Harleigh was a famous Political Science professor who had worked in both the Nixon and Reagan administrations, and who was always heard to sound off against Bush at a "news" site called "Capitol Hill Blue."
At the time, it didn't make sense to me that any news site could do this consistently and get away with it. But the guy who ran the site was once a regular reporter. How, I wondered, could a formerly "good" reporter could "go bad"? I assumed that he had once learned how to to proper reporting, but that somehow he had become corrupt or lazy.
In light of the Jamil Hussein allegations (which came on the heels of things like the phony ambulance attack, photoshopped smoke, the Green Helmet man, and more), I was beginning to think that George Harleigh might not have resulted from the imagination of a reporter who became corrupted, but that using fictitious sources is just the way things are done.
Commentary
One of my favorite movies was Who Killed Roger Rabbit? I liked it so much the fact that none of the characters existed (with the exception of a few human props like Bob Hoskins) bothered me at all. But nothing matches reality if you want fantasy. We have 650,000 dead people in Iraq, as estimated by the Lancet, many of whom died in Baghdad airstrikes without any airstrikes in evidence. We have two countries attacking other countries that have become completely invisible. Magicians in The Prestige would be totally outclassed. We have documents composed in Microsoft Word that go back to the 1970s. It is better than Back to the Future. And all of it is real. Like Jamil Hussein who has been seen, or so we are told, by AP reporters. But maybe Hussein really is one of the live-action human props in this toonscape. Just right for a new movie combining elements of Eragon and Jurassic Park. "In a world of fiction, something has survived." Something. But it doesn't have to be true.
7 Comments:
Wretchard said, "We have documents composed in Microsoft Word that go back to the 1970s"
While Dan Rather and Mary Mapes stand by the document, Terry McAuliffe thinks it might have actually been created in 1994, using the default settings of MS Word, by KARL ROVE!
When a free society is under attack, what should it do about an irresponsible (and unprofessional)media?
Is the answer to turn liberalism against itself -- allow citizens to sue media who promulgate inaccurate or unverifiable information?
Don't forget fearlessly fording the crosswalk by Kayak.
In six inches of water w/pesky passersby walking in the background.
Oui oui. Great bit of wordplay. I commend it as an example of what could be used to drive out postmodernists. Nothing deflates self-elect overly serious fools as causing their audience to laugh at them. And be quick about it folks before they've fully paralyzed our ability to fight who we must.
It is way over due for the “NEWS” people to be held to a higher standard, but like the Union member who no matter how corrupt its leadership or the Democrat party is they will vote for them until they die because they believe in their hearts that everybody does it, its just the other side hasn’t been caught or control those who would tell if they could.
The MSM members have a higher calling then the truth and it was and still is taught that truth is ether in the eye of the beholder or not relevant to the news.
The only way to reverse the track America is on that leads to its own destruction is to alter education of Americas young, from pre-K to College. The left has conquered this and controls the controllers of the ability to change education so it is sad to say a very small chance that America will change in a peaceful manner.
summignumi,
One of my readers, weswinger, had to point this out to me. He saw how well it fit in with my observations of the mechanizations of the anti-natalists and death cultivationists of the West.
Postmodernism: rejects, or is deeply suspicious of, truth, objectivity, and progress, and is characterized by a distinctive anti-science, anti-capitalist
mentality.
I find it sad that it is necessary to add that postmodernism is therefore both anti-American and anti-humnan.
I would think that promoting the understanding of this movement can quickly make up for much of the Left's miseducation.
But there is so much resistance to what I've been saying, even here, that I don't really know.
To provide a quick brain-boost when we'll need it most, does anybody else have any better suggestions?
Could this be the enemy practicing Taqiyya?
Post a Comment
<< Home