Friday, March 10, 2006

Crushed and broken on the virgin soul

The body of Christian Peacemaker Teams activist Tom Fox has been found in Iraq, according to the BBC.

The US State Department says an American who was among four peace activists kidnapped in Iraq last year has been killed. ... Fox, 54, had been working with Iraqi human rights organisations for the past two years. The four men were travelling with Canadian-based international peace group Christian Peacemaker Teams when they were seized by a group calling itself the Swords of Truth.

 

It is abundantly clear from the Christian Peacemaker Team website that they could hardly have done more to declare their sympathy for the Muslim world, the Palestinian cause or their distaste for America. A less haggard Tom Fox is shown holding up a sign protesting the construction of an Israeli barrier in "Palestine". There's a statement abhorring the publication of the Jyllands-Posten cartoons, which says:

We, the members of the Christian Peacemaker Teams in Iraq, are disturbed by anti-Muslim cartoons from twelve different artists published in September by Denmark's daily paper the Jyllands-Posten. The publisher claims the freedom of speech to publish the cartoons, but we believe they are only spreading hate and bigotry. To those who believe and act as if terrorism is an essential part of the Islamic faith, we say No! Stop! We cannot stand by and remain silent when our gracious Muslim brothers and sisters are being defamed.

Tom Fox wrote a couple of articles setting out his goals. In Why we are here?, Fox said:

As I survey the landscape here in Iraq, dehumanization seems to be the operative means of relating to each other. U.S. forces in their quest to hunt down and kill "terrorists" are as a result of this dehumanizing word, not only killing "terrorist", but also killing innocent Iraqis: men, women and children in the various towns and villages.

It seems as if the first step down the road to violence is taken when I dehumanize a person. That violence might stay within my thoughts or find its way into the outer world and become expressed verbally, psychologically, structurally or physically. As soon as I rob a fellow human being of his or her humanity by sticking a dehumanizing label on them, I begin the process that can have, as an end result, torture, injury and death.

"Why are we here?" We are here to root out all aspects of dehumanization that exists within us. We are here to stand with those being dehumanized by oppressors and stand firm against that dehumanization. We are here to stop people, including ourselves, from dehumanizing any of God's children, no matter how much they dehumanize their own souls.

Fox was not oblivious to the fact that terrorists in Iraq killed innocent people too. Or that his life was in danger at terrorist hands. He could offer no definite answer to the question he himself posed: "How do you stand firm against a car-bomber or a kidnapper?" But he was sure of one thing: fighting was always the wrong answer.

Clearly the soldier disconnected from God needs to have me fight. Just as clearly the terrorist disconnected from God needs to have me flee. Both are willing to kill me using different means to achieve he same end--that end being to increase the parasitic power of Satan within God's good creation. It seems easier somehow to confront anger within my heart than it is to confront fear. But if Jesus and Gandhi are right then I am not to give in to either. I am to stand firm against the kidnapper as I am to stand firm against the soldier. Does that mean I walk into a raging battle to confront the soldiers? Does that mean I walk the streets of Baghdad with a sign saying "American for the Taking?" No to both counts. But if Jesus and Gandhi are right, then I am asked to risk my life, and if I lose it to be as forgiving as they were when murdered by the forces of Satan.

Comments

I knew a man once who rushed to church in tears of gratitude over the fact that he didn't have to kill someone. It was at the height of Ferdinand Marcos' power and his secret agents were taking a tremendous toll of the underground. Two men in this mans' cell had disappeared. The first had taken a Greyhound-type bus to the Cagayan Valley and had never gotten off. Another had gone by outrigger from Luzon to the island of Mindoro, where it was said, he had been killed on a beach upon landing by a .45 pressed to his nape as he walked unsuspectingly on the sand. The suspected betrayer was a small, bucktoothed man with almost childish enthusiasm for basketball, given to hysterical fits of laughter. But he was certainly the informer and had to die before he betrayed a third. As it happened, someone else killed the informer and man whose job it was to shoot him was everlastingly grateful that God had arranged for the cup to pass away. Someone else had done the deed and he could go from out the darkness of the Marcos dictatorship with only sweet memories upon his soul.

The question that always bothered me was whether that person -- or any man -- had any right to expect someone else to do the dirty job for him. Can we ever simultaneously acknowledge the necessity of a deed and the absolute immorality of doing it? That in a nutshell is the Problem of Evil: that evil exists and that by and by we will have to face it. The question Tom Fox should have posed is "how do you stand firm against a car-bomber headed straight for a schoolbus?" And if you say, "shoot to save the children" ask yourself if it ever justified to be glad that God had sent someone else to shoot the bomber and go hell in your stead. Tom Fox stood for his beliefs to the bitter end. And now the men who killed him are out there, waiting to kill again.

234 Comments:

Blogger Charles said...

Wretchard

You posted this as I just finished commenting on your last piece.

3/10/2006 09:46:00 PM  
Blogger reliapundit said...

too bad for his family.

but i refuse to get wroked up over dupes like him and his idiot buddies.

they equate us with the jihadists. and this idiotic and irrational false equivalency is the real reason they went into harm's way.

if they were rational, and if they understood that the jihadists are evil and that we are good, then they would have never gone where they went.

if instead of running interference for the enemy, he supported our efforts he'd be alive.

as it is, he died for idiocy.

what a waste.

3/10/2006 09:54:00 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

May God keep him and his family - I hope at the moment of his death he felt strong in the rightness of what he was doing.

But my feeling is that he threw away his life because of a basic misunderstanding of the nature of this world. This world is a place of struggle between life forms for survival and it was designed to be that way. We are meant to grow through our struggle to survive. That doesn't mean we should not look for ways to live in peace - we should - but we should never bow our heads down to have our lives taken away by those who would happily kill us for their gain. And essentially that is what this man did....he misunderstood the nature of life in the raw and he met it head on in the form of a jihadist in Iraq.

3/10/2006 09:58:00 PM  
Blogger RWE said...

In order for evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men....

....to always act only like "good men."

3/10/2006 10:06:00 PM  
Blogger Mike Lief said...

Oh, please. Spare me a moment's mourning for this fool.

Gandhi and his ilk can only succeed when their foes are unwilling to be utterly ruthless. While the Indian pacifist made out okay against the Brits, his peaceful resistance would have proven hilarious to the Nazis. Stalin would have chuckled, filled his pipe and watched through narrowed eyes as Beria put a bullet into the ascetic's head.

I find pacifists to be perhaps the most contemptible of all creatures. They exist only as a result of the courage and sacrifices of brave men, who shield them from the natural cruelty of the world.

That Fox was unable to see that evil will triumph if good men do nothing, after the Holocaust, after the Killing Fields, after Rwanda, is simply disgusting.

His death is meaningless, for his killers valued his life no more than he did.

3/10/2006 10:19:00 PM  
Blogger bobalharb said...

My prayers go out for this good man who lived his convictions. My prayers go out for this good man.

3/10/2006 10:22:00 PM  
Blogger bobalharb said...

Mike lief--you understand nothing.

3/10/2006 10:25:00 PM  
Blogger bobalharb said...

Mike lief--if it were not for men like that you would have no moral compass at all-he may have died uselessly--but he died for his beliefs, and they are the only kind of beliefs that will ever lead us to peace. I celebrate this man.

3/10/2006 10:39:00 PM  
Blogger Cybrludite said...

Bobalharb,

How is Mike wrong? This pacifist was running interferance for the violent luntics who killed him for it. That's about as sensless way to die as I can imagine.

3/10/2006 10:44:00 PM  
Blogger bobalharb said...

He may have been wrong--I am not arguing that point--I wouldn't do it myself-I am all for the western world-I am for fighting the Islamists with all we have-but to dis a man who died for what he believed in--peace--it just ticks me off.

3/10/2006 10:51:00 PM  
Blogger Mike Lief said...

Bob, you're right in part. Fox's beliefs truly are the only kind guaranteed to lead to peace.

The peace of the grave.

As for my moral compass, it points to Army Sgt. 1st Class Paul R. Smith, who was posthumously awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his actions on April 4, 2003, when he saved more than 100 American GIs, killing 20-50 of the enemy, before he fell, mortally wounded.

Not only did he save the lives of his comrades that day, but the lives of countless others who might have suffered at the hands of the enemy troops that Sgt. Smith made sure would never fight again.

How many lives did Fox save?

3/10/2006 10:56:00 PM  
Blogger bobalharb said...

What are we fighting for if we do not have a moral compass? I agree he may have been wrong. Let's just not dis the guy.

3/10/2006 11:00:00 PM  
Blogger joebal said...

So to die for your beleifs is somthing to be respected regardless of anything? If someone were to kill themselves after the future election of a black person, because of their deep racist beleifs, would should offer that person a moment of silence? When I have children, I want tthem to know about people like Fox, and how pointless his actions were. If you beleive stongly in something, I would think that the least you could hope for is that you made some difference, miniscule or otherwise. Fox accomplished nothing, except perhaps starting this thread. Pathetic.

3/10/2006 11:10:00 PM  
Blogger wretchard said...

Fox differed from the poseurs in that he was willing to pay top dollar for his sense of moral comfort. Grant him this: he was willing to pay for it in full. But I think it is fair to say the same can't be said of the ordinary kumbaya crowd. They've lived in security for so long they really can't believe that the necessary bill for pacifism is the one that Tom Fox signed up for.

To paraphrase Hemingway, "all pacifist stories, carried far enough, end in death, and it is a dishonest storyteller who keeps this fact from you." That's the part they keep back.

3/10/2006 11:12:00 PM  
Blogger 49erDweet said...

bobalhard, mike lief might be saying it too crudely, but his point is pretty valid. Mr. Fox truly did not understand the nature of the forces he defended. And for that, alone, he behaved foolishly.

It may be noble to die defending one's beliefs, but it can NOT be noble to just willingly 'give up' your life for no purpose. And I challange you to construct a 'supporting' peaceful purpose in Fox's slaying. It changes nothing, and it makes the Canadian group of which he was a member also seem to be ineffectual in their 'ministry' efforts.

Unlike results portrayed in the movie "The End of the Spear", this story seems much more likely to end up merely an unimportant postscript, and not become the "tipping point" they sought. I fail to see how this tragedy brings glory to God, even though I pray I am wrong.

3/10/2006 11:14:00 PM  
Blogger Steve Skubinna said...

The way I look at it, if you won't fight for your beliefs then they aren't worth dying for. Mr. Fox cast himself into the only role possible for somebody so dogmtically pacifist as he was, that of hapless victim.

3/10/2006 11:23:00 PM  
Blogger bobalharb said...

Mike lief says his death was meaningless. I disagree with that. His death may have been mistaken, and futile, but I cannot see it as meaningless. Was the death of Jesus or any of the others meaningless--and I am not a believer--except in peace. Once again, where do we get a moral compass from? Do you want to become like them? The jihadis? I am for fighting them. Carridine, help me out!

3/10/2006 11:25:00 PM  
Blogger bobalharb said...

Wretchard, correct if I am wrong, but I do not think that Hemingway said all pacifist stories end in death, I remember he said all stories end in death, and a good story teller would not keep that from you.

3/10/2006 11:37:00 PM  
Blogger bobalharb said...

Good night all--I have to go to work tomorrow--we are all on the same side.

3/10/2006 11:49:00 PM  
Blogger Milan Oskoryp Sr. said...

bobalharb:
religion of "peace" was kiling people 1400 years and is wiling to kill another millenium if we let them to do that.I met belief that they started to do that as answer to Crusaders.In that case I must say that almost 400 years to see to the future was from Muhammad and Co realy unbelievable art.Crusaders came cca 400 years after Muhammad.Second mistake of many people is belief that there are good mooslims and bad jihadists.Quran is only one and talks to every mooslim by the same language.Third and bigest mistake is belief,that if we shall accept islam as ours religious neibourgh,we can live side by side in peace.The truth is:jews could do anything and Holocaust would not be prevented.I agree with somebody saying that Gandhi and all his teaching could succed against foe such as Brittons-chrestians.Gandhi was lucky that he did not meet islam in any form.Islam takes form such that it fullfils word of Quran.To take over Europe it takes form of Jihadis.Jihadis will kill theirs brothers if they will stay in road to Global Caliphate.Mullahs used cartoons 3 or 4 months after publication in that Danish publication.

They needed those cartoons in Febr/2006.So?
Stupidity of those pacifists as Fox despite theirs personal heroism, is only trying to prevent ours fighters from fight for continuation of our civilization.
Stupidity of his assassins is also clearly visible.They show what they are-killers who are trying to erase us from this globe.I only hope that USA will take lives of those "heroes" as wake-up call.

3/10/2006 11:52:00 PM  
Blogger Fellow Peacekeeper said...

The insurgents kill their own best friend, a usefull idiot corroding the heart of western resistance.

Well, hats off to the misguided Mr Fox, in that he went all the way (assuming he really understood that they really were going to really abuse and really kill him and he turned the other cheek anyway- then it was brave as hell. Of course, if he didn't really understand that than it is just weak and pathetic).

Though, the more I think about it, the more this sort of Martyrdom of radical western peaceniks should be celebrated and encouraged.

THREE CHEERS FOR MR FOX, MAY ALL THE CHRISTIAN PEACEMAKER TEAMS SHOW YOUR DEDICATION!

3/10/2006 11:53:00 PM  
Blogger The Wobbly Guy said...

A top candidate for the Darwin Award, in more ways than one. The gene pool is better off without him.

I won't cry for a misguided moronic fool like Fox. I'll laugh instead, long and loud and hard. So long, sayonara, adios, sucker.

The meek shall inherit the earth, a 6 foot plot above them. Guess what, it's true!

3/11/2006 12:19:00 AM  
Blogger The Wobbly Guy said...

Milan-Gandhi didn't meet islam in any form?

He did, and there were muslims who subscribed to his ideals, and some of them were actually very saintly. Pity there weren't more of them.

Let's not forget there were many muslims in India even then.

3/11/2006 12:21:00 AM  
Blogger Doug said...

Milan,
Maybe there are good supporters of Hamas and Bad supporters of Hamas?
...as well as good and bad illegal arms middlemen?
---
Sanctimony and Silence
For all the bluster, mum’s the word on the main question as the ports debacle ends.
So to all the bitter port proponents, spewing all the bile: Once you’re done with the insults, the slanders, the juvenile analogies, the constructive-engagement Kool-Aid, and the rest of your bag of tricks, can you please explain, just one time:
Why doesn’t it matter if the UAE provides material support to Hamas?

---
I Don't Blame The UAE For Bailing...
If you want to get round export controls, just sell the product to a front company in Dubai.
The middlemen will take it from there.
---
Crushed and broken on the virgin WSJ Dogma.

3/11/2006 12:23:00 AM  
Blogger Starling David Hunter said...

A Tibetan philosopher of whose works I am particularly fond wrote this in the 1940's about pacifists of the day. The shoes still fit the today's pacifists:

The Pacifist Position

The second point upon which I would touch is the arguments brought out by the pacifists of the world. All true and good people are pacifically minded and all hate war. This is a fact which the academic idealist and pacifist often forgets.

Such people tell us that two wrongs do not make a right; and to meet murder with murder (which is their definition of war) is sinful; that war is evil (which no one denies) and that one must not take part in it.

They contend that thinking thoughts of peace and of love can put the world straight and end the war. Such people, fighting the existent fact of war, usually do little or nothing concrete to right the wrongs which are responsible for the war, and permit their defence - personal, municipal, national and international - to be undertaken by others. The sincerity of these people cannot be questioned.

It should be remembered, in countering these ideas and in justifying the fighting spirit of the Christian democracies, that it is motive that counts.

War can be and is mass murder, where the motive is wrong. It can be sacrifice and right action, where the motive is right.

The slaying of a man in the act of killing the defenceless is not regarded as murder.

The principle remains the same, whether it is killing an individual who is murdering, or fighting a nation which is warring on the defenceless.

The material means, which evil uses for selfish ends, can also be employed for good purposes. The death of the physical body is a lesser evil than the setting back of civilization, the thwarting of the divine purposes of the human spirit, the negating of all spiritual teaching, and the control of men's minds and liberties.

War is always evil, but it can be the lesser of two evils, as is the case today."

3/11/2006 01:14:00 AM  
Blogger wretchard said...

We read from Reuters that his poor guy was tortured before he died. I thought on all his past pictures, the earnest looks, the hopeful orange uniform ... all the useless accoutrements of pacifism ... and get very, very angry. Those SOBs had no right to kill this man any more than they had a writ to kill a child.

Civilization, if it has any purpose, to protect the silly and the weak in spite of themselves. The kids, retards, old, infirm and the pacifists. None should die before the wolves while civilization stands. We no longer leave grandma on the trail with a bottle of whisky and a razor when she gets too old to walk. From that point of view no innocent man deserves to die. But Tom Fox's killers certainly do.

3/11/2006 01:22:00 AM  
Blogger Sparks fly said...

Howdy do!

It appears Fox committed suicide-by-Islami.

Perhaps his killers have been convicted of sin by his idiocy, stranger things have happened but the Bible says that many will be destroyed by peace. Worship God not peace.

Jesus was The innocent God/man who gave HIS life for the sins of the world. That is finished: tetelestai! The wages of sin is death and it was paid to the Father in full. No one else needs to die for the sins of the world.

If Hemmingway said all stories end in death he was a liar. Jesus rose from the dead! As will all who are in HIM. Hemmingway also committed suicide-by-shotgun.

People believe lots of crazy things including Hemmingway. Some people worship mellons but I never heard of anyone giving his life for a mellon.

If you kill a suicide bomber you do not go to hell and if you die for peace you do not go to heaven, automatically. To get to heaven you must be born again into Jesus Christ. It is a gift of God that no man should boast. You have to ask God to save you in Jesus' name. I'm a sinner! C'mon you know how it goes. Save me Jesus.

Great conversations.

Thanks Wretchard.

3/11/2006 01:26:00 AM  
Blogger Cutler said...

Fox differed from the poseurs in that he was willing to pay top dollar for his sense of moral comfort. Grant him this: he was willing to pay for it in full. But I think it is fair to say the same can't be said of the ordinary kumbaya crowd. They've lived in security for so long they really can't believe that the necessary bill for pacifism is the one that Tom Fox signed up for.

To paraphrase Hemingway, "all pacifist stories, carried far enough, end in death, and it is a dishonest storyteller who keeps this fact from you." That's the part they keep back.


I said on a previous thread that I generally despise pacifists, especially those who preach their sanctimony while knowing that braver men will do the dirty work to protect them. Those willing to die, to not fight back in that dark alley, I can grant some measure of respect, though as you've noted - they are the minority.

Fox certainly died for his beliefs, but I still would like to know if, in the days before his death, he prayed that some bad American special forces would burst through the door to save him. If so, he's not the latter.

Either way, in this context, he's objectively as much a threat to this country as the jihadists, perhaps even moreso because he'd sap our ability to protect ourselves from not only the jihadists, but any other group that came along. Red on red.

3/11/2006 01:30:00 AM  
Blogger Mike Lief said...

Wretchard, the flaw in your statement is to use the word "civilization" in connection with the animals who killed Fox.

Mercy for the weak, the infirm, the stupid is not to be found amongst these people.

The uniforms change: Stormtroopers in black; KGB in cheap suits; Cultural Revolution cadres in Mao jackets; jihadi beards and jogging suits.

But the essential cruelty remains the same no matter the wrapping.

That they tortured Fox serves no purpose, other than seeing an infidel scream.

I agree wholeheartedly; they deserve death. But a death far less kind than that permitted by the tremulous West; they deserve the kind of death they inflicted on this hapless man.

3/11/2006 01:34:00 AM  
Blogger Cutler said...

"...but he died for his beliefs, and they are the only kind of beliefs that will ever lead us to peace. I celebrate this man."

I sympathize with you bob, but in my opinion we will never have total "peace."

So long as that is true, men such as Fox, with their blunt and un-nuanced view of the world, will always be a tool in the hands of aggressors and evil men.

3/11/2006 01:35:00 AM  
Blogger Cybrludite said...

Bobalharb,

How, exactly is "mistaken & futile" different from "meaningless"? The only meaning I can find to take from his death is "Don't do that!" In all honesty, the world would be a better place had he gone to Iraq and blood eagled those who ended up kidnapping him. Sometimes peace can only be achieved via appaling violence. Fox's methods wouldn't stop Mussolini or Petain, much less Stalin or Hitler. These folks have lived such sheltered lives in the West that they have no conception of what evil really is, nor do they understand that there are degrees of evil and that some evils are needed.

One more bit that just came to mind: Fox's death also has the meaning of "Be careful what you wish for." He went to Iraq to look for evidence of torture, and sho 'nuff, he found it!

3/11/2006 01:57:00 AM  
Blogger Starling David Hunter said...

Mike Lief said" I agree wholeheartedly; they deserve death. But a death far less kind than that permitted by the tremulous West; they deserve the kind of death they inflicted on this hapless man."

Mike, I think the reason that we are told "Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord" (Romans 12:19) is that no man can mete out the punishment that those killers deserve without darkening much of the light of his own soul.

For any of us to give those men just the kind of death they inflicted on Fox would be to place our feet firmly on the same crooked path that that killers had trod. To my mind, a firing squad will do nicely enough.

3/11/2006 01:59:00 AM  
Blogger wretchard said...

CNN has this to add:


During a news conference, the Rev. Carol Rose, a Christian Peacemaker Teams co-director, said she forgives Fox's kidnappers and renewed her plea that the other three hostages be released.

"We do hope mercy will be extended to the other three," she said.

Calling Fox a man who maintained "a firm opposition to all oppression," Rose urged anyone angered by Fox's death not to retaliate and to "set aside all inclination to vilify or demonize others, no matter what they have done."


Mercy? How have those three remaining hostages sinned against their captors that they might seek mercy? The word is money. The kidnappers are waiting for money. The reason they dumped Tom Fox onto the pavement is to show what happens when mammon is not forthcoming.

3/11/2006 01:59:00 AM  
Blogger Fellow Peacekeeper said...

"Civilization, if it has any purpose, to protect the silly and the weak in spite of themselves. The kids, retards, old, infirm and the pacifists. None should die before the wolves while civilization stands. "

Very suspect train of thought. Its apparent that Tom Fox deliberately and consciously went a long way to get himself offed. If anything THATS the mark of civilization - an holy fool like Fox being suffered to write his own destiny.

But on the other hand he also almost certainly incited and encouraged others to put themselves in his position. Given his statements, he would almost certaily have given shelter and comfort to wounded terrorists hunted by "eeevil" western soldiers. He did give them comfort by opposing the forces of the west in Iraq.

A pearl of wisdom from appears to be Fox's weblog : http://waitinginthelight.blogspot.com "I have to assume the racist attitudes of the security contractors stems from the necessity for a human being to dehumanize and marginalize another human being in order to kill them. Dehumanization is a mind game military-leaders the world over have used to indoctrinate recruits with and it also seems to be the case with these mercenary soldiers."

"It has become increasing evident to me that after stripping away all the rationales for the US invasion of Iraq, what is left is the reality that the current U.S. Administration felt compelled to invade from a basis of hate."

"Fearless, prudent and wise. We in CPT need to work to find a balance between all three of these character traits. But is its my sense that removing ourselves from the shadows and darkness will never create the capacity for those living in the shadows to grow in the light."

"The force of war has three central aspects. First it requires a tremendous deal of energy. Both external, physical energy and the internal drive to carry out the external aspects. Second it requires tremendous organization and teamwork. To take on the implementation of a war plan requires a great number of human beings working together. Third it requires a unified vision of purpose. Goals must be established and everyone plays a part in their successful outcome. Unified vision, teamwork and energy are all very good things to make use of to bring about the creation of the Peaceable Realm. But in the case of warfare all of these aspects come from a reverse image- and that reverse image comes from the negative, parasitic energy of Satan."

Sorry to speak ill of the recently departed, but Tom Fox - YAAFM.

3/11/2006 03:22:00 AM  
Blogger Cannoneer No. 4 said...

Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side you automatically help that of the other.

3/11/2006 03:46:00 AM  
Blogger wretchard said...

fellow peacekeeper,

There are lots of people driving around with bumper stickers saying "war is never the answer", "imagine", "peaceful patriot", "peace works", "how to win the war on terror: don't be afraid", "war against evil is a contradiction in terms", "can we try a little peace now", "war creates more terrorists", "let love rule", "peace takes courage", etc. Tom Fox is hardly alone except in that he put his money where his mouth was.

It's a deplorable fact, but a fact nonetheless, that the USS Iowa was nearly rejected as a museum ship by the city of San Francisco because it was once an instrument of war. It was subsequently accepted on the proviso that the ship be used to host "peace conferences" and symposia promoting gender equality. What to do when the jihadis come to cut the moonbeam's throats? What to do?

3/11/2006 03:48:00 AM  
Blogger A Jacksonian said...

Do you mean that he was not given a military tribunal to find his status? Perhaps he would have wished to be in Guantanamo.

Do you mean to say that he was held someplace where none knew where he was? Perhaps he would have wished to be in Guantanamo.

Do you mean to say that he was not treated like a civilian caught up in the winds of war? Then he may have wished to be caught by an orderly military run by an accountable State that adheres to the nicities of warfare and the agreements of such between States.

Do you mean to say that he was used as a propaganda piece, to be disposed of once his value of incitement was over? Then perhaps he would have enjoyed the unlawful personal sport of the small minority of a percentage that were found and prosecuted at Abu Ghraib where the worst he would get is panties on his head and being led around on a leash for that sport.

Do you mean to say he actually thought that trying to defend those that hold to no State, to no law save their own, to no form of agreement on the proper treatment of civilians caught up in war and to say that these concepts amongst the affairs of men were better than an orderly arrangements between States?

These Transnational Terrerists do not respect any of the things that make the civilized order between Nations possible. They seek, each in their own way and corner, to tear down that structure and replace it by that of force of will with a gun. Death is their only answer to those that disagree. Death now. Death later. Death always. It is their rallying cry.

What do we call people who do not build but only seek to destroy?

What do we call people that act in an uncivilized manner to bring down the order of all Nations?

What do we call people who obey no law, save those they set, and even that be unsteady as power shifts amongst them?

For these people do have a name, you know. It is an easy one, once placed in those terms. They are self-defining.

Perhaps the poor man who sought to enforce the rights of those that respect none may have realized his folly in contributing to the tearing down of that civilization that gave him birth.

Instead they gave him death.

What are they?

Barbarians.

And how many more of these people who 'wage peace' will they kill?

As many as they can get their hands on. All of them if they are given their way.

These Barbarians are called many names: al Qaeda, ETA, FARC, Shining Path, Islamic Jihad, MILF (do NOT google that!), Jamaa Islamia, Hezbollah, Hamas, Fatah... they seek the same, each in their own way. They cross-train and seek common methodologies and suppliers. Their avowed goals are different, their results eerily similar.

To overturn the Rule of Law and replace it by the Law of Rules, and they seek to make the rules by fiat on their own.

They are Barbarians.

They can either be civilized or killed. There is no third way of it. I would prefer the former, but they choose the latter.

So be it.

THAT we can give them in fair measure. And then some.

3/11/2006 04:19:00 AM  
Blogger putnam said...

To me his situation is analogous to Europe and the US vis a vis the wanabe caliphate. While talking big about human rights, old Europe hinders our efforts to democratically transform the middle east, all the while accusing us of torture and oil-greed, and even worse while simultaneously paying randsom to these murderers. In the end probably they too will end up with a bullet to the head.

Four times the US has bailed out Europe, and the US is being backstabbed again while doing it a fifth time (WWI,WWII,Cold War,Serbia, and now Caliphate Wars), all in the last 100 years. In every case the pacifists have have abetted the enemy, even when after every victory they were prooved wrong yet again, and yet they always come back to help the other side the next time the use of force is required.

I say they have long lost their credibility, and also their right to be protected. I am only glad that no US forces risked their lives trying to save this fool.

3/11/2006 05:20:00 AM  
Blogger K. Pablo said...

His death was heartbreakingly futile. Two quotes sum it up:

"It is hypocritical to label Muslims as terrorists when our own countries have been the greatest perpetrators of terror and violence around the world" (from Christian Peacemaker Teams website. This was Tom Fox's group).

And, from (Qu'ran 4:171) "O people of the book! Commit no excesses in your religion: and say nothing of God but the truth. Jesus Christ, son of Mary, was indeed an apostle of God...therefore, believe in God and his apostles, and do not say 'Three'. Desist, and it will be better for you, for indeed God is one God, exalted above having a son..."

Desist, and it will be better for thee.

3/11/2006 05:20:00 AM  
Blogger diabeticfriendly said...

Once again the "freedom fighters" of the islamic world show the depth of their commitment to utter insanity...

they murder a anti-west, anti-jew, pro arafat, pro-arab moron..

I am SO mad i think i will draw a cartoon.....

3/11/2006 05:23:00 AM  
Blogger RWE said...

In 1940 Orwell said that to be pacifist was to be objectively pro-facist.

The Nazis were uninfluenced by pacifists, and so Great Britian and the other democracies could not be.

The same is true today.

Fox was objectively pro-Jihadist. In fact, he was rather more than simply objective about it.

3/11/2006 05:23:00 AM  
Blogger The Wobbly Guy said...

It is always instructive to heed Machiavelli, no matter what the times. As I've noted time and again, lesser evils must often be committed to prevent even greater ones.

3/11/2006 05:27:00 AM  
Blogger Fellow Peacekeeper said...

Fox reminds me more than little of the Hindus Sadhus. The terrs that murdered the holy fool would probably also torment small animals and children for laughs, and deserve no mercy whatsoever.

What to do when the terrs come to cut the moonbeam's throats? As always, stow the philosophy, follow the ROE and whatever laws one is sworn to uphold. If the law says protect moonbeams (*sighs*) then ....

Grossmans "On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" is relevant here, but what do with sheep that try to all bar stuff themselves down the wolves gullet? And badmouth the sheepdog for interfering?

3/11/2006 05:33:00 AM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

Product Alert:

Return as defective any Moral Compass that points only to S for suicide.

3/11/2006 06:45:00 AM  
Blogger whit said...

Tom Fox, like Timothy Treadwell (the Grizzly Man), went where he had no business going and for that he paid the ultimate price. And for what?

3/11/2006 06:56:00 AM  
Blogger Milan Oskoryp Sr. said...

k.pablo
nice citations indeed.Nicely removed for purpouse from Quran.There are many different ones.
Imagine junction of many roads.If you chose any of those roads you get to one,only one particular place.That place stinks from blackened blood of victims.This is valid of islam,Aztecs,Inkas, and many other different cultures of history.World according to such citations must go through those victimized experiences to reach what?To became that stinking blackened piece of blood and meat?To protect oneself is sin?Against whom?I saw hundreds of pictures from WWII taken by mine relative fighting on side of Russians.If guts hanging from tree were those of German or Rusian,what difference it made?World has no right to protect itself.Religion of "peace" was kiling its victims for almost 400 years before came force trying to protect this world.Were those men siners?I understand every mine arg.can be overturned and used against them.1400 years protectors ours way of life went and went and
fought.What could happen if those guys read Quran and dealt according to those suras and fatwas.If they became Sunnis,they were killed by Shiites.They stayed christians and fought every kind of islam,because every kind of islam decided to kill them and those who were protected by those long time forgoten by history.
Fight is fought all that time,be it for belief,oil,piece of soil or whatever.Maybe all that time there were forces steping into way of those fighters as they are today.
Are we thinking what will happens if all of us shall do as those Peacniks
would like us to do and to have us there where our enemies want to have us.
"......and everybody took day off.."
Bradbury.
That is not thinking of Cindis Sheehans of this world,but thinking by seemingly reasonable people.
God help us.We are trying.

3/11/2006 07:02:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

The question, "what if the suicide bomber is making for a group of children?" overides all others, I think. Tom Fox''s prescription is for before the emegency, or after it; not during it.

He also left behind a family (including two kids--tho they may be grown, I don't know)--which presumably needed him in particular--while the world needed him only in general.

Against all that, he did expose the evil (he was beaten with electric cables before he was shot dead) for the eyes of his fellow pacifists, who may be a little sobered, a little more attentive, today.

Many good points made here. Many contradictory and all true, paradox in spades. Horse-laff at the otherworldliness? Contempt for pacifism's benefiting from those willing to sacrifice their own 'purity' in order to defend that pacifism? Respect for Mr. Fox going all the way with his convictions? Yes, yes, yes, all true.

Doug, re Hamas and UAE--I don't know the details, but keep in mind that that relationship could be better influenced from the inside than the outside.

The Gulf States are laboratories--let's not be PETA outside with spray paint. Let's be inside, making the curing medicine.

3/11/2006 07:02:00 AM  
Blogger wretchard said...

I'm bound to say that the CPT has made a caricature of Christianity, which is not a suicide pact, any more than the Constitution is. It does not instruct you to stand, with arms folded, while evil runs amuck, like a pedophile runs through a pre-school. Forgiveness isn't equivalent to passivity.

Neither blindness nor a lobotomy is a prerequisite to following the teachings of Jesus. There's something intrinsically evil about demanding dehumanization, as these activists effectively do, as the price of entry into the CPT paradise. It is as false a mode of salvation as suicide bombing, which in a way it is, as practiced on oneself. That said, the civilizational compact is that the nonmoonbeams protect the moonbeams.

3/11/2006 07:12:00 AM  
Blogger Sardonic said...

The Ismaili killed Fox in order to demoralize his pacifist organization, and others like it. These organizations are trying to help the Iraqis, and despite their anti-west propaganda statements the Iraqis probably like the West more rather than less because of the help people like Fox provide - physical help with food medicine blankets, or whatever (guessing here). So the Ismaili want to destroy that link in order to drive a bigger wedge between the Iraqi people and the West. Thus they kill and torture the guy in order to convince those like him in the pacifist organizations to go home. It might work, too. On the other hand it might do for the Pacifists (who are after all Idealists) what the Cartoons do for Mooslims. Make them mad and get them pumped up to do more... good. So despite his rather pathetic rhetoric, I would say there is some good that may come from Fox's activities, and the activities of the Pacifist groups in Iraq. After all, it is highly probable that their motive is to cause the Iraqi people to see that not all Americans (Westerners) are "tyrants" or "satan's people". Thus, the effect may be what they intend after all - that at least some Iraqis (and others in the ME) may look at their activites and say "These are not all bad people" and that may lessen the edge of hate from the Islamic world toward our own. Therefore, despite his pathetic death at the hands of vile pigs, he may have produced a positive effect somewhere in Iraq - maybe one less Jihadist who now looks at Fox as a "martyr". Maybe even a conversion. While it might not make sense, it still may be true. I don't revere Mr. Fox because I think his logic was rather poor, but even so, I admit he may have done some good that we will never know about.

3/11/2006 07:23:00 AM  
Blogger Mətušélaḥ said...

The highest moral imperative is survival. Every Sophie's Choice to attain that goal is the correct choice. This of course also applies to Jihadis as well.

3/11/2006 07:23:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

I agree, Wretchard--and 'dehumanization' is Mr. Fox's own theme (according to his published manifesto).

So there's the kernel paradox responsible for all the spin-off paradoxicals: Mr. Fox's beliefs about dehumanization are themselves dehumanizing.

You touch on something very deep, and probably what got early Christians featured in the Coliseum in the days before Constantine had his vision.

3/11/2006 07:31:00 AM  
Blogger The Wobbly Guy said...

Sardonic-I do hope you're right. If every pacifist had Fox's convictions, we should supply them with food, medicines, and whatever to go to Iraq and Iran to preach their peace and foster reconstruction of the country. Hell, we'll foot the bill!

The one thing we will not provide, of course, is bodyguards. Unless they ask for it.

It's a win-win-win-win situation. The West gains even more favor with the Iraqis, the pacifists get to demonstrate the depths of their convictions, the islamists get their quota of infidels to kill, and we reduce the numbers of bleating idiots in our midst.

What's not to like?

3/11/2006 07:34:00 AM  
Blogger The Wobbly Guy said...

"That said, the civilizational compact is that the nonmoonbeams protect the moonbeams."

I'm sorry, but the nonmoonbeams will not protect the moonbeams who feel that they do not require the nonmoonbeam's protection.

Freedom of choice includes the freedom to forgo protection by the non-pacifists. Even if there are soldiers sworn to their defense.

It's a free world. People should live and die on their own choices, their own responsibility. Fox did so for his choices.

3/11/2006 07:38:00 AM  
Blogger Mətušélaḥ said...

Milan Oskoryp Sr.,

You're only telling half the story. Why not tell the story of Roman barbarism that preceded Islam.

3/11/2006 07:40:00 AM  
Blogger trangbang68 said...

Fox was the face of post-Biblical Christianity,a rejection of the inherent evil that dwells in men's hearts.We have armies and police forces because men are not pure in heart,but because beneath the veneer of civilization lurks dark primal forces like the scum who hung the contractors on the Fallujah Brooklyn Bridge.
Fox went off on a fool's errand.His end if anything shows that his analysis of the human heart was fatally flawed.He tried to bestow dignity on monsters and they butchered him to show they had none.
I heard a spokesperson for his group on NPR this morning.She cheapened Fox's killing with a diatribe about the US "illegally detaining Iraqis"These people are enablers of our enemies.While I mourn Fox's slaying ;it's difficult to see him as anything but a morally obtuse imbecile.He was sincere,sincerely wrong.k

3/11/2006 07:41:00 AM  
Blogger Mətušélaḥ said...

She cheapened Fox's killing with a diatribe..

Mr. fox did this already all by himself.

3/11/2006 07:45:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

If the moonbeams would only look at this war (at least the modern incarnation) in its fullness.

It began under President Carter, who shared, early on, Mr. Fox's ideals.

Those ideals opened the door to a great leap forward for the forces of evil ('evil' in that they hurt people in the here and now).

And then even Mr. Carter was fast abandoning those notions as time ran out on his term (and practical experience bore down on him).

Mr. Carter. of course, has re-regressed since then, being unable to shake the sting of personal rejection, and being at heart a "rule-or-ruin" cultic.

3/11/2006 07:53:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

What I'm getting at is--as Wretchard remarks on the faint odor of sulphur about the cross-armed passivist refusing to stop the killer at work, Mr carter's pacifism and soi-disant enlightened spirituality may've gotten us into another world war.

Passivism/pacifism creates violence--ergo, it *is* violent.

It's the same paradox of the anti-nuclear protesters (the real pacifists as opposed to the Reds-pretending) of the late cold-war, trying to unilaterally disarm.

What about the other guy? What happens during that chunk of time *after* we go passive, and *before* the other guy similarly "evolves"?

And why is that even a question that needs asking? It's not like it's a complex thought, for crying out loud.

3/11/2006 08:12:00 AM  
Blogger Mətušélaḥ said...

The bastards killed Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic.

3/11/2006 08:14:00 AM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

Somewhat OT but interesting.

The little Danish paper that could is reporting that the Koran is being indicted in 5 or more German states as incompatible with the German Constitition.

I'm not sure if the translation is accurately capturing the legal terms of art but at least some Europeans are trying to change the Conversation.

I think we're seeing a blowback. The reluctance of the EU and USA media orgs to report the Motoon infitada in an adult fashion is resulting in grass roots opposition to Islam as a whole (the ports). All we need now is some particularly skillful demogogary and hello fascism.

3/11/2006 08:17:00 AM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

Here's the link Agora

3/11/2006 08:20:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Maybe it'll be just a task-oriented temporary fascism. You know, to enforce the culture's legality, and not to dredge up another 'ein volk' blood-and-soil ideology.

3/11/2006 08:22:00 AM  
Blogger Cedarford said...

Folks like Tom Fox were why Christians proved such easy meat for the Arabs sweeping into the Levant and beyond. They found a pile of pacifist aesthetics who "prayed for the soul" of their butcher then sheep-like bared their necks for the sword. When packs of Islamoids appeared on the horizon, Christians ran unarmed to their churches to pray for deliverance. The Jihadis simply found their prey conveniently packed into a small space ready for butchery, like cattle agreeably milling together on a killing ground and mooing as each throat was slit.

Jews met Pograms in similar fashion, sometimes mercifully dispatching their whole family in agreed on suicide pacts, rather than face the indignity of fighting and mob abuse. Pacifist Buddhists were wiped out of their original homeland by Islamoids. Their culture and monuments progressively eradicated over the centuries to make them as forgotten as the Zoroastrans the Islamoids also exterminated.

Only when the Islamoids met people determined to fight them - Christian warriors and the warrior caste of Hindis - was the drive to impose a stultifying Mohammadean culture over all of mankind stopped.

Only when Jews chose to stand their ground and fight at Warsaw and in Israel did the world take notice of their humanity and conclude that Jews indeed have values they thought worth fighting for.

Tom Fox is dead. Just like past exemplars of milksop Judaism, Buddhism, and Christianity who voluntarily self-extinguished while their killers laugh and roam free, and breed more just like them.

Tom Fox, like the rest of the "turn the other cheek" milksop Christians and the "nothing is worth dying for because no life from anu culture is of more value than any other life" multi-culti worshippers in Europe and N America --do not appear to have the answer to what to do when the killers come into their midst.

RIP, Tom Fox! Well-meaning meat for predators, but meat nevertheless.

3/11/2006 08:23:00 AM  
Blogger 2164th said...

Fox died for being naive. His Islamic killers will probably never be brought to justice. There will be no Islamic protest, not a whisper of it. In Europe a trial of Milosovic has been going on for four years! The EU court effectively gave Milosovic a life sentence without ever convicting him of anything. Sounds like Guantanamo. A court in the Hague gives known terrorists, the 'Hofstad Group' a pass. The German courts free a convicted killer of a US serviceman and can't make stand a conviction of known terrorists. The Austrians convict a holocaust denier to three years in prison for saying stupid things. We should join the "World Court" with the caveat that it include Judge Ito. It is time to put our collective legal system on trial.

3/11/2006 08:23:00 AM  
Blogger alainerose said...

Mr./Rev. Fox's death is a horrible thing. His pacifism is not, as long as it is personal, and not made political. To be a pacifist, and live it like he did is a brave thing. He risked his life to follow the tennents of his faith as he saw it, is worthy of rememberance, and grief. He tried in his own way to bring peace, and one day, if one of executioners changes his life becasue of what Fox lived, and died for, it may well be worth the effort.

Are there not many stories of Christians who sacrficed themselves to save others in Nazi concentration camps? Were their deaths in vain too? Some of you are missing the point of his death and sacrifice.

That being said, what Mr. Fox did that made his sacrifice so ignoble and wasted was when he did what liberals always do these days. He politicised his beliefs, and labeled all who disagree with him as being the same type of evil. To equate a Muslim terrorist and an American Soldier, who use violence for different reasons is awful. Becasue he makes both equally evil since they use violence he de-legitimizes his own sacrifice.

Liberals, in their call for peace, never seem to call for peace, only the peace that hurts the West, or those who risk their lives for the same liberty the liberals have. I have never seen a peace activist call on the Palestinians to stop bombing Jews, or demand and apology for the 1948 war on Israel. I have never heard of a peace activist try to convince a woman with a suicide bomber's belt to rethink thier killing. Nor have I seen a peace activist call on Al Queda to renounce violence in Iraq or anywhere else. That is the problem Mr. Fox and his group/users of his memory have, they are one-sided.

His personal sacrifice is noble, his public abuse of those he disagrees with is shameful, and why his death has aroused such neagativity here. Be a little more careful with your opinions of him, than his people are of us.

3/11/2006 08:49:00 AM  
Blogger Marcus Aurelius said...

I'm bound to say that the CPT has made a caricature of Christianity, which is not a suicide pact, any more than the Constitution is. It does not instruct you to stand, with arms folded, while evil runs amuck, like a pedophile runs through a pre-school. Forgiveness isn't equivalent to passivity.

I am bound to agree with the idea that CPT has made a caricature of Christianity. Some time ago, I read a book by a Spanish priest written back in the 1950's called Man, The Saint and his argument was Christianity was being feminized and how the priest instead of being a bold advocate for justice and right was turning into a limp-wristed sentimentalist afraid to take action, lest being accused of not being a "nice" guy.

Tom Fox's compatriots in (and Mr. Fox in his time) kidnap-victimhood are straddling the divide I describe above. They combine the two in such a way that creates a suicide machine. Boldness with no sense of justice and the fear of not being called a nice guy.

3/11/2006 08:53:00 AM  
Blogger Mətušélaḥ said...

What's your game, Cedarfard. Why is it that I find myself in agreement with you.

3/11/2006 08:57:00 AM  
Blogger Aristides said...

Tom Fox, Tuatha’an. RIP.

This man was one of us, folks. He did not deserve what he got.

3/11/2006 09:15:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Today's WSJ has an interview with Thomas Wolfe, which throws light on the topic at hand:

"All of us are products of this vast plane called the social reality, the weight of the time and place we live, intersecting vertically with the individual psychology, or our impulses. And a person's psyche, to use a vague term, is the result of the intersection."

"I think every living moment of a human being's life, unless the person is starving or in immediate danger of death in some other way, is controlled by a concern for status."

3/11/2006 09:26:00 AM  
Blogger Aristides said...

We're pretty hard up if all we give this man's torture and death is a dismissive sniff. So he was a moralistic scold. So what?

And the idea that this man was giving aid and comfort to the enemy is ridiculous. He was a lamb, eaten by wolves. He may have been wrongheaded to enter their lair, but it wasn't he who made them carnivorous.

3/11/2006 09:27:00 AM  
Blogger Aristides said...

And a person's psyche, to use a vague term, is the result of the intersection.

Substitute the term elected identity for psyche, and you are in the realm of cognitive science.

I always enjoy Tom Wolfe. Thanks for the link, Buddy.

3/11/2006 09:30:00 AM  
Blogger trangbang68 said...

Aristides,
He may not have made the wolves carnivorous ,but he and his ilk blur the definition of them as wolves .It is faith without substance,standing on the solid ground of ....nothing.
In a relativistic world where truth cannot be pigeonholed,what do we fight for?
If nothing is evil,is anything good?If all belief systems and cultures are morally equivilent then why not turn it over to the Wahhabis if they have the drive to take it?
Fox was on one hand a bumbling dope stumbling down a dark alley where the wolves lurked.He also was the spiritual avatar of Mother Sheehan,Fat Moore,Teddy Kennedy and the rest of the leftist termites eating the foundation out of our society.I have alot more tears to shed for some kid from Georgia that lays down his life in the 4th Infantry Division than a deluded guy like Fox.God rest his soul.

3/11/2006 09:45:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Today is the 2nd anniversary of the Madrid Train Bombings. Spaniards are laying wreaths at the picturesque nearby memorial, named "The Forest of Remembrance".

I can't help but wonder at the incompleteness of it all, given their government's reaction to the attack.

3/11/2006 09:49:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

FoxNews had some video of the Spanish event, and some minutes later some video of disabled US soldiers, looking like high-school kids, in hospital therapy rooms, learning to make do with missing limbs. Fox drew no connection, but a viewer might, and feel a little bitter at Tom Foxism--regardless of much else.

3/11/2006 09:54:00 AM  
Blogger whit said...

trangbang:
You nailed it, the Chrurch infiltrated by post-modern liberalism. Before long, it's no longer Christianity.

3/11/2006 10:02:00 AM  
Blogger whit said...

Buddy:

One thing I noticed about libs and Euros is that they make a good show of grief and mourning.

3/11/2006 10:04:00 AM  
Blogger Cutler said...

We should be "hard up," if we believe our own propaganda on the scope of the threat. These days there's plenty of other dying people to focus on, as opposed to this guy.

That he's "one of us" [I presume you mean a "Westerner"] is all the more reason to have less compassion, not more. It's evidence that he should have known better. He chose to be such an ascetic, willful dupe. I'd give more benefit of the doubt to a jihadist who was indoctrinated in a Madrassas.

The Oxford pledgees were even younger and more naive, yet few doubt today that they gave aid and encouragement to the enemy. Weakness does not create evil, but it often allows it to spread by inviting aggression and testing of the limits.

3/11/2006 10:07:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Yes, very disconcerting, an oil-and-water mix of fatalism and secularism.

3/11/2006 10:09:00 AM  
Blogger Aristides said...

In a relativistic world where truth cannot be pigeonholed,what do we fight for? If nothing is evil,is anything good? If all belief systems and cultures are morally equivilent then why not turn it over to the Wahhabis if they have the drive to take it?

That is quite beside the point, though I wonder if you meant to implicate me in these questions.

If these are meant to summarize my philosophy, I would strongly suggest rereading everything I have posted on Wretchard's blog for the past year.

As for Tom Fox, yes, he is a prime target for substantive criticism. What I wondered at was what I perceived to be a callous response to his torture and death. Surely one can be wrong, dead wrong, about one's human philosophy, and still not deserve such a gruesome end.

This man was one of us. He was wrong, but he was one of us. He was not a turn coat. He was one of us.

I do not know what your metric is for measuring the dispensation of tears. I myself have shed none. What I feel, more than anything, is sheer, unadulterated rage that the barbarians killed another American. For that alone, they deserve to die.

3/11/2006 10:14:00 AM  
Blogger desert rat said...

So Mr Fox is off to Heaven, where he will be cradled, forever, in the arms of his Lord. He was after all doing his Lords work, here on Earth

The Mohammedans are off to recieve their 72 Virgins in Paradise, to recieve all the Earthly Pleasures denied them in Life. They are after all doing allah's work, here on Earth.

Both ideas seem to be different forms of the same insanity.

3/11/2006 10:14:00 AM  
Blogger Aristides said...

I have friends, colleagues, and family who think the way Tom Fox thought, people who, even after hearing of this story, will never disbelieve in the potential for peace on earth and goodwill towards men.

Our disagreements on this point are about as intractable as you can imagine, but neither camp, neither me nor them, has ever thought to impose their beliefs on the other on pain of death.

That is the baseline, and it bothers me that some here do not see it. That is the line we're defending, the point of demarcation where tolerance wins out even when one must tolerate a blasphemy. Tom Fox stood with us above that line. For that, I mourn his death.

3/11/2006 10:24:00 AM  
Blogger exhelodrvr said...

Aristides,
I don't think it is that people here do not see the potential for peace on earth, it is that people here (including myself) completely disagree with Fox's methodology. We see it as counterproductive to his own ultimate goal, and dangerous in its naivete.

3/11/2006 10:30:00 AM  
Blogger desert rat said...

aristide,
Mourn not for Mr Fox.
He followed his beliefs, to their natural end.
Mourn for the Iraqi civilians blown to bits by Mohammedan bombs. Civilians who only went to the market, for their daily bread.

Mr Fox knew of the dangers, and accepted them. He chose to Walk in the Valley of Death. He was not an innocent bystander, but an active particpant in the conflict.

One can only hope that his Faith did not fail him, in the end. Because if it did, he will be lost forever, won't he.

Mourn for his children, but not Mr Fox.

3/11/2006 10:32:00 AM  
Blogger Mətušélaḥ said...

Ari,

A grown man who goes out of his way and deliberately sticks his finger into a live electric socket to get himself electrocuted.. and tries to teach others to do the same. Even a dumb animal knows better than that. There's nothing to mourn. The human gene pool is better off without his ilk.

3/11/2006 10:32:00 AM  
Blogger Mike H. said...

Let's not confuse those who follow principle and belief with those who follow power. M Moore, et al. should not be considered the equal of Fox. They are cowards, he is dead due to his convictions. As much as I think that he's wrong he still gave measure. Muhammad Ali went to jail for his convictions, I fought in 'Nam for mine, I respect Ali and myself.

3/11/2006 10:32:00 AM  
Blogger Cutler said...

"This man was one of us. He was wrong, but he was one of us. He was not a turn coat. He was one of us."

"One of us"?

I reject that just because he was born in the place he rejected, it means he was "one of us," and therefore deserving of grief. It is irrational parochialism.

"Mourn not for Mr Fox.
He followed his beliefs, to their natural end.
Mourn for the Iraqi civilians blown to bits by Mohammedan bombs. Civilians who only went to the market, for their daily bread.

Mr Fox knew of the dangers, and accepted them. He chose to Walk in the Valley of Death. He was not an innocent bystander, but an active particpant in the conflict."


Agreement.

3/11/2006 10:38:00 AM  
Blogger Peter UK said...

Fellow Peacemaker quotes,
"It has become increasing evident to me that after stripping away all the rationales for the US invasion of Iraq, what is left is the reality that the current U.S. Administration felt compelled to invade from a basis of hate."

It is obvious that Fox,put himself into the hands of his slaughterer as a bargaining chip to be used to wring concessions from the Coalition.
Even now his murderers are escaping the odium,the blame will be placed squarely on those who Fox believed are the true evil,the Coalition.
This was blackmail pure and simple,when the blackmail did not pay off for his captors,Fox was expendable.He made the fatal mistake of judging his captors by himself,the foolish prattle about demonisation of the enemy blinded him to the reality that his humanity was not considered in the slightest by those who tortured and murdered him.
There is no good and evil in this,his life meant as little as that of a mouse to a cat.
Save us from holy fools!

3/11/2006 10:38:00 AM  
Blogger speaker-to-animals said...

as it is, he died for idiocy.

No, he was a martyr. He died for his belief, sure in every fiber of his being that he will be rewarded in an afterlife.
EXACTLY like Muhammed Atta and Tom Hill.

And, like Sir Richard Dawkins says in the Root of All Evil, this behavior will continue unchecked as long as there is religion.

3/11/2006 10:39:00 AM  
Blogger Rich Casebolt said...

Forgiveness isn't equivalent to passivity.

Too often, the well-meaning confuse forgiveness (whose active application requires repentance from the "sinner" as a prerequisite, regardless of when it is offered) with "turning the other cheek" (which is done, either actively or passively, in the face of ONGOING injustice), extending the "seventy times seven" mandate for forgiveness to cover this activity.

However, the same Creator whose Son told us to "turn the other cheek" equipped us with a total of only four cheeks.

He also equipped us with a brain ... and expects us to use it before we run out of cheeks, in the face of an enemy who seeks neither their own repentance ... or our forgiveness.

------------

Desert Rat ... it is my hope that the copies of the Koran these thugs use has a typo ... and that they are in fact meeting with some VIRGINIANS (in the Patrick Henry mold) as we speak.

3/11/2006 10:41:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

I think people have private opinions on this event--as opposed to political opinions--because of the setting. Outside the killing zone, everything is philosophical, but having jumped into the fire, all bets went null--Mr. Fox could've gotten soldiers killed trying to rescue him. Neither his politics nor his actions are without consequences.

Look, my daughter has a friend whose dad cannot hear a child cry, or be near meat, without an immobilizing anxiety attack. He was one of our guys in the Central American shadow war, cleaning up after "Liberation Theology" had set the killers loose in the villages.

3/11/2006 10:43:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Ha! and after Patrick Henry gets through with 'em, there, Bible in hand and lightning flashing in his eyes, stands Stonewall Jackson!

3/11/2006 11:00:00 AM  
Blogger Aristides said...

Exhelo,

I don't believe in the potential for peace on earth. I absolutely do not. Not in the slightest. It is inconsistent with our biology.

Look, I feel sorrow for the manner of his death -- no one who has not committed some horrible crime deserves such ill treatment. I also feel anger that yet another American has fallen under the beast. And it is not a geographical identity I am talking about. It should be obvious by now what I mean.

Is Mr. Fox simply a man who stuck his finger in a socket? Is he merely the next candidate for the Darwin Awards?

Maybe. He was a moral innocent who believed a lie about reality. He was Tuatha'an. Did he place soldiers' lives in danger. Maybe, though I doubt their lives are models of safety in the first place.

I do not agree with his politics. I do not agree with what he did, and I think it was the worst kind of naivete to take such pacifism into Iraq.

Mr. Fox believed he could find goodness in the heart of darkness, and he perished for it. After all I said, I still consider such a man to be on my side.

I feel I have belabored this point. Perhaps it is because I am reading justifications of why we shouldn't care. It seems to me a far more healthy exercise to search for common ground with Mr. Fox, rather than insisting that his death matters not at all.

3/11/2006 11:01:00 AM  
Blogger Mətušélaḥ said...

Bud,

Who's going to duel Satan on the Banjo?

3/11/2006 11:05:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Mika, for a Russian Jew Israeli Canadian, you gotcher Hillbilly transcendentalism down purty dang good!

3/11/2006 11:12:00 AM  
Blogger Doug said...

"Look, my daughter has a friend whose dad cannot hear a child cry, or be near meat, without an immobilizing anxiety attack."
---
Every time my wife puts vegies in the disposal, I run into the bathroom, flush the toilet, and turn on all the water to drown out the vegiscreams.
Where that came from, I ain't tellin.

3/11/2006 11:13:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

You're cold, Duke Kahanamouka.

3/11/2006 11:17:00 AM  
Blogger Charles Martel said...

It would seem that Tom was a bit of a naïf to say the least. But it is precisely this sort of muddle headed relativistic poppycock that has landed the West in the predicament we are in today. We are facing an implacable enemy who knows no restraint. Muslims by the millions are willing to die for their “faith” while your “turn the other cheek” and “love your enemy” brand of Christians are not only unwilling to fight for their faith they compound their sins by criticizing those that that are. Has Christianity and Christian civilization become so depleted and impotent that it can no longer successfully defend itself? I do not believe that the New Testament is a suicide pact.
The barbarians are not only at our gates but within them. And we must once again find the courage and confidence to make choices and think critically. There are civilizations, value systems, ideas, people, and cultures that are superior to others. Our failure to openly acknowledge and embrace this simple fact in deference to relativistic has rendered us defenseless in the face of an enemy who has no self doubt whatsoever and does not understand the meaning of equivocation. We’ve been living off the accumulated capital of Western Civilization for many years - taking for granted the contributions of giants upon whose shoulders we stand. But our time has come.
We can begin my making critical choices unburdened by cant and political correctness but based on the evidence provided by our own senses. Every single time we bow to political correctness we are contributing in no small measure to the destruction of our culture. What does our liberty mean if we do not have the freedom to stand for Truth?

3/11/2006 11:35:00 AM  
Blogger Cosmo said...

1. Casebolt is right. You can't forgive someone who doesn't think he's done anything wrong, will not apologize and seeks no repentence.

2. I know bobalharb went to bed a while ago but:

a) I certainly don't need naifs like Fox to orientate my 'moral compass.' I'd argue his compass was defective on many levels, starting with the notion that his willful blindness encouraged aggression and violence.

I got my moral compass from men who'd been to hell and back on islands in the Pacific without losing their souls. THEY had strong moral compasses.

b) Being willing to die for one's convictions does not automatically make one noble in any way (e.g. suicide bombers, the 'courage' of the 9/11 perpetrators, etc.).

3/11/2006 11:37:00 AM  
Blogger Alexandra said...

All Things Beautiful TrackBack Tom Fox's Natural Born Killers

3/11/2006 11:41:00 AM  
Blogger Peter UK said...

Doug,
We know where that came from,fermenting pineapples.

3/11/2006 11:49:00 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

Someone wrote:

They are Barbarians.

They can either be civilized or killed. There is no third way of it. I would prefer the former, but they choose the latter.


Actually there is an even more appealing third option, employed throughout history with good effect to deal with barbarians (including in Israel today):

Build a wall.

Figuratively or literally. Build a wall, put the barbarians outside (or inside, depending on your perspective), and leave them to simmer in their own 7th century juices. Adopt policies that effect an outflow of muslims from the West back to their historic lands, and do not allow them to enter the West.

The benefits:

(1) No more need to change our nations into police states, spying on all of us. Airports go back to the way they were before.

(2) No need to fear assassination if we write or draw something muslims find offensive.

(3) No need to try to change muslims into democrats, or kill muslims to punish them or eliminate their threat.

(4) Hugely reduced risk of further terrorism. They have no military means of hurting us in any serious way, and if we don't allow them to fly, sail, drive, or walk into our lands, they cannot hurt us. (If they acquire nukes, we make it clear that one nuke blown up in the West results in the annihilation of the nuclear muslim lands.)

Separation is not only workable, it is the only solution that is workable. We are not morally capable of exterminating them (thank God) and we cannot ever change them. That only leaves separation - and the Israelis are proving that works quite well.

I would even go a step further and say that if access to oil is a hindrance to this separation, then we should be straightforward and realistic and invade and take enough of the middle east to secure the oil we need, evicting all muslims within the occupied area, and reaching an agreement with the other major powers like Russia, China, and Europe to share the proceeds.

3/11/2006 12:01:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

It seems events have caught up to us, again. The General President must have decided it was time to join the fight. The loss of Miran Shah, if only for a few days, has awaken our best ally in the 1st of the Mohammedan Wars.

" ... ISLAMABAD, Pakistan Mar 10, 2006 (AP)— Pakistani soldiers backed by helicopter gunships targeted a suspected militant hideout near the Afghan border, killing about 30 militants in a volatile tribal region that has seen repeated clashes in the past week, a military spokesman said Saturday.

The spokesman, Gen. Shaulat Sultan, said the attack was launched late Friday near Miran Shah, the main town in North Waziristan. ... "

Pakistani Soldiers Attack Suspected Taliban Hideout Near Afghan Border; 30 Militants Killed

" ... Pakistan has deployed 80,000 troops and mounted a series of military operations in tribal regions to flush out militants. Pro-Taliban tribesmen insist that most of the people killed in the army raids were innocent civilians, a charge the military denies. ... "

trish was right, once again, as well as being ahead of the News curve.

It may just be that Mr Bush's visit lit a fire under the General President. Better Paki troops than US, but that Pakistani aQ Sanctuary may be just be closing, aye.

3/11/2006 12:06:00 PM  
Blogger Das said...

ovdebdrThe nature of our enemy will reveal what we are up against: it is a consuming fire. The fire is not choosy: compliment it, fight against it, whatever; it will consume you if you throw yourself towards it. That is what makes hostage - and family of hostage - pro Islam declarations so pathetic. Because ultimately this whole thing is not about Islam; it's about fire.

3/11/2006 12:12:00 PM  
Blogger 2164th said...

"They are Barbarians.

They can either be civilized or killed. There is no third way of it. I would prefer the former, but they choose the latter."

Mark, I concur. Other than oil, there is little else we need from them. Of course, we have to have a president with the testicular fortitude to stop celebrating Ramadan in the White House. It would do wonders if we had leaderrship that would declare in ten years time, the US will use it's vast financial assets and technology to be a net exporter of liquid fuels. Of course we do not have a president that has the courage to seal our own borders, so let us not be think too large.

3/11/2006 12:14:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

The Real Duke Kahanahomestar
Texas Luau
Pee on Their Fire

3/11/2006 12:18:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Looks like a big MS-13 roundup today, too. Somebody's been listening to ya, Rat. Even tho everytime I see "aye" I wonder where's Olive Oyl.
\:-D

3/11/2006 12:23:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

I'll tell ya what, buddy.
I am of the FIRM conviction that there is a staffer at the White House assigned to read this blog.

It's as close to a "hot line" as any a citizen can hope to find.

But that's just an opinion, of mine.

3/11/2006 12:29:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

2164th -
Undocumented Residents are a Growth Industry:
Invest Wisely.

3/11/2006 12:30:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

MS-13
" ... Federal officials have identified 5,000 Mara Salvatrucha gang members in a database, but the number of gang members in the country is unknown, making it difficult to determine the impact the arrests have had on its membership.

However, David Brown, a Dallas assistant police chief who attended the Washington news conference, said the 149 arrests in his city since Operation Community Shield began had contributed to a 20 percent drop in the city's murder rate. ... "

nah, there is no need to secure US borders.

3/11/2006 12:33:00 PM  
Blogger 2164th said...

Doug,

I just sold Exxon and bought Taco Bell.

3/11/2006 12:36:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Think of the Prison Union Riots!

3/11/2006 12:37:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Some guy's getting busted by his boss for having an Ad on his weekend
Gardening Service Truck
that touts:
I Speak English!
---
A Diversity Crime, No Doubt.

3/11/2006 12:39:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

I think Marlboro owns Taco Bell. So, 2164th, you hate clean air, eh?

3/11/2006 12:41:00 PM  
Blogger trangbang68 said...

Aristides,
I'm not by any means celebrating Mr.Fox's untimely passing only denigrating his philosopical position.I would question the purity of his faith.The West has always had useful idiots ,many of them clerics who unquestioningly sidle up to totalitarians and barbarians and point the accusing finger at the land that spawned them.They are are least naive,at worst fellow travelers.
Fox was "one of us" as being a citizen of Dar al Harb,the land of war.He wasn't a Barbarian.It shows why the jihadis must be crushed.Everybody other than them is a sheep for the slaughter.
Speaks-to animals:Your equivilence of Mr. Fox's faith with that of Mohammed Atta's only proves what an ignoramus you are.

3/11/2006 12:42:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

'Rat 12:06 PM,
So that's the Anvil she refered to?

3/11/2006 12:42:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Bi-Lingual Education = bye bye, education.

3/11/2006 12:43:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Trangbang might better spell:
Ignoranus.

3/11/2006 12:44:00 PM  
Blogger For Freedom said...

This good man died for his blindness. His blindness was typical of the fanatical pacifist beliefs of the Christian sect which he belonged to, re: Quakers, etc...

He was murdered by the followers of the depraved ideology of the Über-Faith. The mohammedan totalitarian warrior-cult has never produced any pacifist movement along the lines of Quakers or Hindus/Gandhi. Interesting fact! Originating in a fourth century Gnostic sect, the Docetics, and promoted by its megalomaniacal founder, it has spread mainly by war, threat of war, or war by other means.

Keep in mind that Christianity does not simply reject all war and is not generally pacifist. The Vatican, for example, formally accepts Just War, such as war for self-defense. Pacifism is not mainstream in Christianity.

Conclusion: If one wants to grow a beautful garden, one must not be afraid to pull out the ugly weeds.

3/11/2006 12:44:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Bi Lingual Has a whole different meaning in Marin.
Just ask Jamie.

3/11/2006 12:45:00 PM  
Blogger Aristides said...

I am of the FIRM conviction that there is a staffer at the White House assigned to read this blog.

If so, 'Rat, maybe they'll see this.

Trangbang -- I agree.

3/11/2006 12:46:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

You guys hammering Mushareff for only going after Waziris after the Bush visit are forgetting the Taiwan and Jerusalem of Asia: Kashmir. If a wink/nod in the USA/India deal freed Mushareff from immediate concern over Kashmir, it will free him to start in on the Waziri Talibans.

3/11/2006 12:49:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

'Rat predicted McCain for President, and today
McCain came out for President Bush.

3/11/2006 12:50:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

would not doubt that, doug, not for a moment.

Check out over at threatswatch.org

Seems that a lot of nifty toys, to be used against Mr Morales supporters, now are in the hands of Mr Morale's supporters.

At the same time Ms Rice is seeking Mr Morale's cooperation, LOL
" ... Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice plans to meet Saturday with Bolivian President Evo Morales, U.S. officials said, as the cordial relations promised by the Bush administration after Morales's January inauguration show signs of strain. ... "
" ... Morales lashed out at the United States for cutting off funds to a Bolivian counterterrorism unit after Morales named a controversial commander as its leader. He labeled the move "blackmail" and vowed not to return weapons requested by the United States after the program was discontinued. ... "

3/11/2006 12:50:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Bud 12:49 PM,
Maybe we could get some Joos to round up Zub?

3/11/2006 12:51:00 PM  
Blogger Annoy Mouse said...

Fox may have played the strong defiant one for his fellow victims in their futile efforts to apologize for America.

The message must have been, not “where is your god now?” But “show me the money” or “let my peole free”. Although I do not disagree with the vilification of the kidknappers, I can’t help but think in this case it was just a matter of business and this was merely a criminal operation. An operation that Fox, even denying that he was, a witting pawn.

“I walk the streets of Baghdad with a sign saying 'American for the Taking'?”

In the end they made fine hostages and became the hollow mouth pieces for the evil that they dared to deny.

3/11/2006 12:52:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

Big John, doug, don't sell him short.
I don't like the guy, but he has skills, no doubt about that.

If I was betting man,
McCain / Rice '08

I'd put my money there.

3/11/2006 01:05:00 PM  
Blogger Eggplant said...

Mark said...

"Separation is not only workable, it is the only solution that is workable. We are not morally capable of exterminating them (thank God) and we cannot ever change them. That only leaves separation - and the Israelis are proving that works quite well."

Separation works for Israel because it's a tiny nation. Separation is impractical for us due to globalization.

If you're a paleoconservative, you might respond:

End globalization, reestablish trade protectionism, reinstitute isolationism, build walls.

We've been there and done that:

We learned after the Great Depression that trade protectionism doesn't work.

We learned after Pearl Harbor that isolationism doesn't work.

Globalization is correct because it raises the world's average standard of living and reduces the possibility for major wars. A war between America and China is less likely because our economies have become interlocked. This is a good thing.

Concerning the Islamic world, there are really only two possible choices:

1) Encourage the establishment of democracies based upon the Turkish model.

2) Screw up big time and allow one or two of our major cities to get nuked. This then triggers a sequence of events ending our own democracy and resulting in most of the Islamic world being wiped out.

Option 2) is idiotic and morally unacceptable. Option 1) is the only practical option open to us.

The $64,000 question: Will our democratic political system burdened with the cultural damage sustained from the Cold War (the moonbat phenomena) allow us to exercise Option 1)? Not clear...

3/11/2006 01:06:00 PM  
Blogger speaker-to-animals said...

trangbang,
Speaks-to animals:Your equivilence of Mr. Fox's faith with that of Mohammed Atta's only proves what an ignoramus you are.

that does not prove i am an ignoramus, i am not equivalencing faiths.
i said, their motivation, the afterlife, was evivalent.
not their faiths.

you should try proving that i am wrong, instead.
;-)

3/11/2006 01:08:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

That solution seems a bit extreme, ari.

Where would we find all the off shore drilling platforms we'd need?

3/11/2006 01:10:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Zub is Bengali, Doug. Was East Pakistan for awhile, now Bangladesh. You should get to know it, as Hawaii is speeding there @ an inch/year. Collision is immeniment.

3/11/2006 01:11:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

"Encourage the establishment of democracies based upon the Turkish model"

I agree, tho this phenomenon is a big story out of Turkey lately (*sigh*).

3/11/2006 01:18:00 PM  
Blogger defender said...

bobalharb said:

"My prayers go out for this good man who lived his convictions."

And:

"...but he died for his beliefs, and they are the only kind of beliefs that will ever lead us to peace."

If we believe something strongly enough does that mean it is right? No, it does not. There have been many evil people that have also "lived their convictions." Does the strength of their personal belief justify their actions that most would identify as objectively wrong? No.

Will dying pacifists cause world peace? No. Not unless your goal is the 'peace of the grave' or 'the peace of the dead.' Conceivably the world might be at peace... after all on the good side have been slaughtered.

Bobalharb’s comments are from the school of Moral Relativism that says you are a moral person if you follow your own personal belief system, whatever it is. It is simple to see the complete logical failure of this way of thinking about ‘right’ and ‘wrong.’

3/11/2006 01:19:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

...just google [ valley of the wolves ] if the link fritzes.

3/11/2006 01:20:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

Well, buddy, more propaganda for their side, just $10 million USD for that piece of work. Bet the Producers turn a tidy profit.

Meanwhile, three months after the stringer for the Christian Science Monitor was kidnapped there is an ad on Iraqi TV. Mom pleading for her daughters life.

Should have had Shia and Sunni clerics in the ad, bad mouthing he kidnappers, but no, instead of using their own Civil and Moral code against the kidnappers, we beg for mercy.

I certainly feel for the mother and the family, and if the reporter dies, her life I will mourn. But their tactiics for the reporters return are misaimed, I think.

3/11/2006 01:33:00 PM  
Blogger Cutler said...

No good news out of Turkey lately.

To boot, increasingly unlikely they're getting into the EU. And plenty of possibilities for problems with the Kurds, were they to go independent.

Good chance in a few decades we won't be able to poin to Turkey, as an example of "getting it right."

And the irony, is once again, it is partially our fault. We [specifically the Euro's, as a way of preparing for EU membership] denigrated their military's role as the state's secular defender to the point that it is no questionable whether it would set things right were Turkey to go the Islamic path.

3/11/2006 01:36:00 PM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

rat, if the WH read this blog you would be in Gitmo.

3/11/2006 01:36:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Those 'Up-to-No-Good' Americans: Germany's Weakness for Conspiracy Theories

But in this case -- stemming from a Monday New York Times article alleging that German agents in Baghdad had obtained Saddam Hussein's plans for the defense of Baghdad and handed them over to the Americans -- facts have been hard to come by. The Times, citing a US military report, says one thing. The German government categorically denies the allegations.

And Michael R. Gordon, the Times reporter who broke the latest story, based his allegations on a 2005 Joint Forces Command study he obtained long ago. The US government didn't just suddenly hand it to him over the weekend. It's also highly doubtful that some government hack phoned up Gordon to request that he please run the report on Monday.

If there's something to the allegations, they must be investigated. If not, one has to ask the question why such stories are systematically coming out of the US at sensitive points in time."

...and then there's the NY Slimes.

3/11/2006 01:41:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

I doubt it Captain, the White House values honesty.

They need a little input from out side their echo chamber.

In the 14 months or so I've participated, here at the Club, the predictions have been more right than wrong.

But then I was never an Airborne Engineer Company Commander, just an Airborne Engineer.

Officers always were a little behind the curve.

3/11/2006 01:41:00 PM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

Haven't seen this much of an outpouring of sympathy for a terrorist enabler since Bulldozer Girl jumped in front of that D9.

3/11/2006 01:42:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Bud, 1:11 PM
A Tiger is a Tiger, is a Tiger.
...Asian, to boot.

3/11/2006 01:47:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

1:42 PM
At least she wasn't ugly.

3/11/2006 01:48:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

Unless, doug, it's paper

3/11/2006 01:48:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

1:36 PM On his knees Praying to Porto Potato.

3/11/2006 01:51:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

1:08 PM Speaker,
Anyone who cites Dawkins is wrong, just ask Aristides.
MeMe not spoken here.

3/11/2006 01:54:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

Here's a piece from the Weekly Standard.
The author from the American Enterprise Institure, he's honest. too.
Better get his cot a Gitmo ready also, Captain pb

" ... TAKE FOR INSTANCE the ethnic and sectarian composition of Iraqi army units. On several occasions in the past year, U.S. military spokespersons have claimed they are unable to provide a detailed breakdown of the respective percentages of Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds in Iraq's emerging security forces. In a recent email exchange I had with a public affairs officer at Multi-National Security Transition Command--which is responsible for standing up
the Iraqi military and police--it was acknowledged that, while the U.S. military has "some demographics" about the force it is creating, "it's not a database. Nor is it a management tool." ... "

" ... To begin with, both anecdotal evidence and common sense suggest that Iraq's security forces are internalizing some of the tensions pulling at the country's different communities. The issue here isn't just imbalance in the total force, but the proclivity of individual units to turn into partisan militias. An Iraqi brigade, for instance, that is overwhelmingly composed of Kurdish peshmerga or Shiite militiamen would seem significantly more likely to place its loyalties with political factions in Erbil or Najaf, rather than the official power ministries in Baghdad. Indeed, if we see overt sectarian purges of the army, it is a clear sign that Iraq is slipping into civil war.

The establishment of non-sectarian units, on the other hand, would offer some of the most tangible, visible evidence that Iraq really can function as a unitary state. More than just an economy-of-force substitute for withdrawing American troops, an integrated Iraqi army could help bind together the country's fissiparous communities in a genuinely national, representative institution.

Given the significance of the army's ethnic and sectarian makeup, why then has the Pentagon been uninterested in collecting and analyzing data about it? One possibility, of course, is sheer carelessness on the Defense Department's part. ... "

" ... FAIR ENOUGH. But in the absence of data--the very metrics that Congress has been demanding for months now--it's all but impossible for policymakers and the public to evaluate the administration's claims of progress. Just how unbalanced are Iraq's 10 divisions? What kind of movement in bringing Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish soldiers together has been made since the last report was issued in October 2005? Is the problem getting better or worse?

The Pentagon's reluctance to engineer the ethnic and sectarian composition of the Iraqi security forces is made all the more bizarre by the fact that it has displayed no such reticence when it comes to parallel efforts in Afghanistan. ... "

Data Points

I mean, Captain pb of the Airborne Engineers, are they going to need 200 million cots in Gitmo, one for every American that disagrees with Mr Budh?

3/11/2006 01:58:00 PM  
Blogger Marcus Aurelius said...

Since my last comment I have been trying to come up with words to express my opinion on the debate on whether or not we should feel outrage on behalf of Mr. Fox. Perhaps you can not feel up to outrage but you should not completely unsympathetic.

A commentator at the Jawa Report sums it up for me nicely: I find this situation irreconcilable in my mind, but not the sympathy aspect.
I have already seen people criticizing this mans ideology and trumpeting how it got him killed at LGF, which is ironic seeing as one of their threads which has been mentioned a lot of times was the "screw 'em" post about the "mercenaries" (Blackwater) killed in Fallujah at dailykos. I do not find it any different to blame the victim. [emphasis added]

While I do not share his feelings, or reasons for going to Iraq, I can honestly say I cannot criticize his convictions, nor his feelings of wanting to be a part of something bigger than himself. Mercy was not afforded to him by his captors, I hope he is granted the peace he wished for in the next.

I pray for the safe return of the other hostages, this man was not singled out because of his beliefs neither religious, nor political but because he was an American, as such that affects us all.

Posted by: davec at March 11, 2006 02:04 AM


No, Mr. Fox was wrong and he paid dearly for being so incorrect, but it is a far thing from moral relativism to admire him for his stand. History is replete with stories of the condemmed soldier or spy moving their executioners to tears with their bravery and conviction.

Don't be a Kos-Head.

3/11/2006 02:02:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

The day you find me on my knees, doug, I'll be fixing the sink, or dead.

I've long been a Emilio Zapata fan.

Better to die on your feet, then live on your knees.

3/11/2006 02:05:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

'Rat,
The Data Mining they suggest would be profiling.
Shame!

3/11/2006 02:09:00 PM  
Blogger Peter UK said...

"rat, if the WH read this blog you would be in Gitmo."

He is,just goes to show how well treated they are.

3/11/2006 02:10:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Rat: Sorry, but I always forget to look it up before I forget it:
Could you name that enchanted Port one more time?

3/11/2006 02:10:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

The Army does it Afghanistan.
I know it's un PC, but that's the Army for you.

3/11/2006 02:11:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Peter 2:10 PM,
All the bitchin and moanin he learned on the AQ Training DVD.

3/11/2006 02:12:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

Puerto Bello, Panama

Henry Morgan, the Pirate, sacked the place on his first mission.

Ole Morgan the Pirate, sometimes Governor, he took decisive action against a numerically larger force and kicked ass.

Great natural harbour and lots of Canuks each winter.

3/11/2006 02:16:00 PM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

I'll believe my lying eyes. Iraqi army units are not squaring off against each other.

Laura Ingraham attended Iraq military briefings. Participants were from all factions and she reported their surprise at even being asked the question.

Iraq clans/tribes have been factionally mixed for hundreds of years. It's a bigger deal to American writers than it seems to be to the Iraqis.

3/11/2006 02:16:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

PB 2:16 PM,
And they surprised her by introducing her to female soldiers.
...but she and VDH are admin shills,
you know that.

3/11/2006 02:18:00 PM  
Blogger Peter UK said...

Peter Boston,
"Haven't seen this much of an outpouring of sympathy for a terrorist enabler since Bulldozer Girl jumped in front of that D9."


Then you had better not look at this lot

a good sprinkling of communists
and the usual ragbag of fellow travellers,usful idiots and subversives.

3/11/2006 02:19:00 PM  
Blogger Peter UK said...

Doug,
That would be the "Be Happy 101" DVD?

3/11/2006 02:23:00 PM  
Blogger Kirk Parker said...

I disagree with both Mike Lief and Bobalharb, regarding the meaningless, mistaken, or futile nature of Fox's death. I think his death serves a very important purpose. While it's unlikely to be what Fox intended, by dying such a death he clearly shows just what kind of an enemy we are dealing with. Each time something like this happens, a few more fence-sitters in the West come to their senses, or so I conjecture. Actually, it's more than just a conjecture, as I've met and talked to some of them.

And Aristides, did you read nothing of what Fox wrote? Not even the snippets quoted here?

3/11/2006 02:26:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Eve Ensler
Author

Jennifer Harbury
Director, Stop Torture Permanently Campaign

They could start by burning Eve's books and closing the Univ Social Science Colleges.

The Vagina Meets a Burning Monolog.
sic

3/11/2006 02:27:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

I disagree with Lief, Bobhalbarb, and Kirk Parker, but that's just me.

3/11/2006 02:29:00 PM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

I always thought that peace meant both sides stop shooting. Peace for Tom Fox and the CPT was more unilateral.

3/11/2006 02:30:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Probably this ground-shaker has already made the rounds. SO seldom we get a chance to give a reinforcing 'attaboy' to NYTimes and Al Jeez--musn't miss it.

Wafa Sultan, may peace be upon you.

3/11/2006 02:35:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Wafa Rocks.
Those who have not picked up on this one yet are being deliberately stupid:

"And there's irony, if not novelty, in the headline: "For Muslim Who Says Violence Destroys Islam, Violent Threats.""

Head explodes for having head portrayed as a bomb.

3/11/2006 02:39:00 PM  
Blogger speaker-to-animals said...

Anyone who cites Dawkins is wrong, just ask Aristides.
MeMe not spoken here.


Is that true, Sir?

and dougie, let me introduce you and the other Belmont Clubbers to biomemes.
lol.

3/11/2006 02:40:00 PM  
Blogger Das said...

"Only liberal societies tolerate Pacifists. In the liberal society, the number of Pacifists will either be large enough to cripple the state as a belligerent, or not. If not, you have done nothing. If it is large enough, then you have handed over the state which does tolerate Pacifists to its totalitarian neighbor who does not. Pacifism of this kind is taking the straight road to a world in which there will be no Pacifists."
- C.S. Lewis in "Why I am not a Pacifist"

3/11/2006 02:41:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Last time I checked, Wafa's Video file could be downloaded.

3/11/2006 02:41:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Speaker:
That's just a Fluke of Nature.
from my Alma Mater:
But still...
the idea that parasites are tinkering with humanity's personality--perhaps even giving rise to cultural diversity--is taking over my head like a bad case of Toxoplasma.

3/11/2006 02:49:00 PM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

Why is this parasite theory surprising? The Borg did it all the time. I saw it on TV.

3/11/2006 02:58:00 PM  
Blogger whit said...

Eggplant, 1:06
100% spot-on right.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Sir Dawkins is a myopic idiot if he thinks that doing away with religion is the way to peace. Evil is in the heart of man. Evil is set loose when man believes there is no penalty.

3/11/2006 03:03:00 PM  
Blogger bobalharb said...

I recall years ago we had an intern pastor here in our Lutheran church(don't blame me I was just born that way and think Luther was mostly wrong--when I say I'm not a believer I mean just not orthodox of any type) who was a fireeating liberation theologist type. He wanted to go to El Salvador and make a witness with his group. Which he did, and got back alive. We all tried to talk him out of it on the grounds that 1)the groups he was supporting would lead the people there if they won into deeper servitude than they were already in and what the region needed was something approaching an honest vote and economic development and 2)he really couldn't do anything himself to alter the situation and it wasn't worth the risk of getting shot. He went anyway and got back alive and he had courage and I would have felt very badly had he been harmed.
I quess all I'm saying is I got to hand it to people who have the courage of their convictions--if their convictions make some sense.

3/11/2006 03:08:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

One thing about Gitmo, though.
The Prisoners do not just drop dead, like the two deaths reported at the Hague in the last week or two.

Those Dutch, just cannot keep their prisoners, alive.
Unless of course, they're Mohammedans.
Those they find hard to hold, at all.

3/11/2006 03:38:00 PM  
Blogger Leathan said...

Wretchard, I think you mean "crushed and broken on the virgin SNOW". That is, if you mean to quote Don McLean's Vincent.

3/11/2006 03:40:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

Ole Morgan, doug, in Puerto Bello when Morgan took the town,
the Spanish had a number of Strong Points. Morgan took the Spanish Priests and Nuns and forced them to carry the scaling ladders in the assualt on the main Spanish position.

Of course the Spanish troops were slow to fire on their own Priests. The Fort fell.

To this day Morgan's name is not held in high esteem in the Panama.

A great asymetrical warrior was Henry Morgan, the Pirate Governor of Jamacia.

No Pacifist, he.

3/11/2006 03:47:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Henry Morgan

3/11/2006 04:00:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

So Panama is Secure enough for Canucks?
(maybe they tip for a change, just to be safe?)
Only change, of course.
---
Knew three wild brothers here, fishermen, 1 that moved down to Costa Rica with his family.
Had A beautiful place out in Hana, I never could figure that one.

Got busted for taking something in his boat (not drugs, but I forget if it was sea life, or what) down there.
Pirates all.

3/11/2006 04:10:00 PM  
Blogger For Freedom said...

(H-T to Kirk Parker 2:26)

Absolutely!

This crime, along with the long list of similar ones, have one thing in common which even an idiot can understand: Namely, that those who (God forbid!) sympathise and appease the Islamic Moloch Baal, may actually be consumed by it - and without a second thought.

That's hardly a strategy designed to promote sympathy.

That's hardly what I would call good marketing strategy on the part of the Über-Faith.

What it shows is the incredible Hubris and arrogance of the Über-Faith. This is their Achilles Heel.

3/11/2006 04:11:00 PM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

Even in the period shortly after the Civil War Robert E. Lee was admired as a great American general despite the fact that he expended his being trying to destroy the Union. Only persons of unusual character can attain that kind of of respect. General Lee did not equivocate his beliefs. He spoke plainly about his perception of duty and how and why he prioritized his obligations the way he did. At the end of the day he accepted the consequences of his decision and did no harm.

Tom Fox and Rachel Corrie may have billed themselves as peace activists but they chose sides as surely as any enemy combatant. They had convictions but they were supposed to be without consequence. Don't insult the integrity of a man'a family then demand to be fed at his table. Hypocrites never become heroes.

3/11/2006 04:11:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Outlawed Kite flying in Pakistan, due to lethal steel and glass-impregnated fighting lines.
Too bad ol Henry's not around:
Three Pakis could stump him on
"What's My Line?"

3/11/2006 04:14:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Noticed San Blas:
Last time we went to Mexico, San Blas Mexico was nice.
...but that was '74!

3/11/2006 04:21:00 PM  
Blogger Ardsgaine said...

You nailed it, the Chrurch infiltrated by post-modern liberalism. Before long, it's no longer Christianity.

I got a good belly laugh out of this. Where do you people think post-modern liberalism got its ideals from? What modern moral thinker invented the notions of pacifism and self-sacrifice? Give me a break. Just because you have drawn a big X through the Sermon on the Mount and chosen to practice the militarized version of Christianity doesn't mean that that's what Christianity is. You can't sit there and pretend that the Early Christians, the Monastics, the Franciscans, the Quakers, and all those Christian sects that took the Sermon on the Mount seriously have "made a caricature" of Christianity! Christianity is a suicide pact. It is a decision to reject this world in favor of God's kingdom in Heaven. You can't twist it into anything else without turning it into a blatant contradiction.

You want a god who will support your right to live in this world? Then you're going to have to make him up. First, make Him a creature of this world, having a definite comprehensible nature, and operating within the laws of the universe--not some incomprehensible, indefinable non-thing capable of suspending the laws of the universe on a whim. Make Him someone who gave Man the Gift of Reason so that he could thrive in a bountiful world, so long as he relied on his own rational judgment. Make Him someone who would reject out of hand any belief in Him that was based on fear of death, fear of eternal torment, or anything other than devotion to the rational understanding of Nature's Laws. Make Him so benevolent, so desirous of the Good of Man that he would never suggest that Man suspend his moral judgment of evil, never suggest that he turn his cheek to his enemies to be struck again, never suggest that those who meekly subject themselves to the will of others will somehow profit in the end. Make Him someone who only looks for worshippers among those who exult in the heroic in Man--those who only seek to create, but will defend what they have created without remorse for the lives of the nihilistic destroyers who are their enemies.

Worship that.

Tom Fox was a nihilistic destroyer just as surely as the men who killed him. Both sought to destroy our will to resist evil, one through fear and the other through guilt. If you accept the moral code preached by Jesus, then you cannot escape the guilt. If you do not accept the guilt, then reject the moral code that preaches it. Let it go.

3/11/2006 04:24:00 PM  
Blogger desert rat said...

I have just read one of the most interesting articles, ever.
"The Framers and the Faithful"

A history of Religion, the State and the debate, amongst the Framers of the 1st Amendment, on it's meaning.

The varied positions of Patrick Henty, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson.

How the "Great Awakening" influence the Revolution and the Bill of Rights.

Perhaps this is a story known to most, but it is a story totally new to me, and quite interesting.

I did not know for instance that Mr Franklin built a nondenominational Church in Philidelphia. Never would have thought.

" ... When local clergy stopped giving Whitefield a place to speak, Franklin helped build a new hall for him—and for clergy of any other religion. Franklin boasted that it was “expressly for the use of any preacher of any religious persuasion who might desire to say something to the people at Philadelphia; the design in building not being to accommodate any particular sect, but the inhabitants in general; so that even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at his service.” For Franklin, evangelicals represented the democratic spirit railing against authority and insular institutions. ... "

Religion and the 1st Amendment

A history I had never known of.

3/11/2006 04:25:00 PM  
Blogger PeterBoston said...

If you want a very interesting discussion of where postmodernism might have come from scroll down to Gramscian damage and follow through the subsequent threads.

3/11/2006 04:39:00 PM  
Blogger trangbang68 said...

Speaker-to -animals,(incidentally I tried to speak to a chow/huskie pup this morning and got bit for my trouble).So I take it the comparison you're making between Fox and Atta is they were motivated by Eternal reward in their respective acts.I question that to some degree as Fox may well have been motivated by that overweening pride and moral superiority so many on the left are guilty of while Atta easily was fueled by the rage,bitterness and frustration so many young Arab men feel at their failed cultures.I don't buy that alot of Jihadis are stupid enough to buy the 72 virgin crap.They are just soul impoverished

nihilists.
I take it your point is the world would be alot better place if we were all secularists.Tell that to the 100 million victims of Stalin,Mao and Pol Pot.
Ardgaine,you take Christian pacifism and extrapolate it into the whole of Christianity.Certainly "vengeance is mine saith the Lord" but surely you've heard of just war theology.Read the writings of Dietrich Bonhoeffer before he joined the conspiracy against the Fuhrer.Read the words of "Battle Hymn of the Republic"

3/11/2006 04:56:00 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Trangbang,
Atta was far from a dummy, but didn't he go through the whole shaving thing at the last minute?
Genius/Madness like that Rock Guy that went Mohammedan on us.

3/11/2006 05:05:00 PM  
Blogger Ardsgaine said...

I take it your point is the world would be alot better place if we were all secularists.Tell that to the 100 million victims of Stalin,Mao and Pol Pot.

Atheism is not a belief system. It simply means one does not believe in God. It says nothing about what one does believe in. Obviously, I don't believe in the same things as Stalin, Mao or Pol Pot. I'm a Godless Capitalist, not a godless communist. As such, I believe in individual rights, including the right to property, which the aforesaid dictators did not.

Ardgaine,you take Christian pacifism and extrapolate it into the whole of Christianity.

No, I just attribute its source to Jesus himself, which means that anything added to it or taken away is inconsistent with what he preached. I don't deny, though, that there is a militarized version of Christianity, which is what became dominant in Western Europe in the Medieval period, and even what I would call a paganized version of Christianity, which is what arose in the West after the Renaissance and Enlightenment. What I deny is that the pacifist form of Christianity is a "caricature" of Christianity. It is Christianity. And what I am saying is that if the teachings of Jesus cannot be practiced consistently in this world without committing suicide like Tom Fox, maybe it's time to drop them and find something that does work.

3/11/2006 05:21:00 PM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Sounds pretty pat n' easy, there, ardsgaine. I've never understood 'turn the other cheek' either (not having been a Rabbi under Roman occupation), but i don't criticize it in any serious way on the basis of there having been so many finely-wrought beings who have understood what I can't, and have lived by it. Innocence-by-association, I guess you could call it. But on the twinning of the demoralizing messages of both Mr. Fox and his killers, I agree.

3/11/2006 06:15:00 PM  
Blogger speaker-to-animals said...

the comparison you're making between Fox and Atta is they were motivated by Eternal reward in their respective acts...
not exactly.
their motivation was that they believed with every fiber of their being that they were doing the right thing. and they'd be comped for it somehow.

perhaps i should explain my nic.
from Larry Niven's Ringworld.
Speaker-to-animals is a young kzin who is forced to act as a translator to humans, since he has yet to earn his true name in the Hero's Tongue.
only i'm a kzinret, not a kzin. ;)

3/11/2006 07:18:00 PM  
Blogger Cedarford said...

Eggplant - Globalization is correct because it raises the world's average standard of living and reduces the possibility for major wars.

That would be where Chinese made 25 cents an hour, Indians made 8 cents, and American industrial/service workers made 28 an hour with benefits and the GNP of the 3 countries was only 14 trillion. Now the Chinese make 4 dollars an hour, the Indians get 3, the US worker is down to 15 an hour with benefirs, GNP is 18 trillion (a Rising Tide Lifts All Boats!!!) and the wealthy owner class gets quadruple the profits they got under the pre-globalization system.

Anything wrong with that picture?

Oh, and I'm sure workers in those dead Heartland American towns are Bound to get higher paying, high tech jobs any day now!

A war between America and China is less likely because our economies have become interlocked. This is a good thing.

That was the folly pre-WWI where the European economies were quite interlocked and even the colonial empires out in the boonies were prospering from intertrade. They thought war was unimaginable because of mutual trade.

Boy, were they wrong!

Now we have China using it's WalMart dollars to buy whole missile and Sukhoi fighterjet factories from Russia, and they have 18 subs in transit to commissioning or in construction in the yards. The US has one sub in construction.

The trade relationship with China is they get 200 billion from their trade imbalance, have destroyed industry after industry in America, and are using their WalMart dollar wealth to buy weapons, do infrastructure in China, and buy up critical global mineral resources, including key rare earth metals firms here and in Canada and S Africa.

Yes, we can buy piles more cheap, short-lived Chinese consumer items. That does nothing to strengthen a nation.

3/11/2006 07:20:00 PM  
Blogger Mətušélaḥ said...

Cedarfad: China.. destroyed industry after industry in America..


Please name those industries.

3/11/2006 09:05:00 PM  
Blogger Chap said...

Fox was in the Marines, by the way.

A Vietnam-era Quaker Marine band player, mind you, but was in the Marines. For quite a while. None of his CPT literature mentions it. Might be some telling and publicly unknown details that would be key to understanding why they killed him first.

Sort of complicates the issue, doesn't it.

Wretchard, roger your respect for someone putting their life on the line. I submit that unlike others, this was not a stand so much as a waste--against nihilists, dying doesn't do that much even symbolically.

I will keep thoughts of Fox's family and offer my condolences.

3/11/2006 10:08:00 PM  
Blogger Fenrisulven said...

"Are there not many stories of Christians who sacrficed themselves to save others in Nazi concentration camps?"

I know that there were mamy "pacifists" who turned away while 6 million humans were rounded up. I'm happy that Mr. Fox take anyone with him.

3/11/2006 11:55:00 PM  
Blogger Cutler said...

"Don't be a Kos-Head."

If Kos had been right on the nature of the merc force in Iraq, a sleazy group of gunhappy cowboys who just want a buck to help tear apart the country, screw'em would never have provoked so strong a reaction.

3/12/2006 12:06:00 AM  
Blogger Cutler said...

To emphasize, I do not see them that way, but the Kossacks do.

Strong emotions should not be apologized for, strong emotions based upon fantasies should be, however.

3/12/2006 12:08:00 AM  
Blogger Bob Smith said...

OT so briefly, globalization has done nothing to slow the increasing insularity of capital/equity wealth from earnings wealth. The latter is expanding - and equilibrating - within a larger operational base while the former is consolidating within a stagnant base. Avenues for the expansion of capital wealth are absent.

3/12/2006 01:24:00 AM  
Blogger Bob Smith said...

A trend that is important in and of itself, but particularly if the economic state replaces the nation state as the focus and machinery of globalized power. We are already seeing this in trying to 'follow the money' trail in the ME, which extends to Europe, Russia, China, ... and the US.

3/12/2006 01:29:00 AM  
Blogger Bob Smith said...

And the dirty little secret, stateside, is that neither market forces nor the government will cushion the inevitable transformations within and among business sectors that have and will continue to abruptly dislocate the economic security of large groups of people - the industrial manufacturing base in this country has been decimated by foreign competition. Market forces, fine. The lack of support structure to reduce the economic sacrifice of sector transition - nonexistent and not so fine.

3/12/2006 01:39:00 AM  
Blogger gumshoe1 said...

"Atheism is not a belief system."


BWHAHAHAHAHA

3/12/2006 01:54:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

Bob, there IS one solution--ban foreign goods. The unions would approve.

3/12/2006 08:42:00 AM  
Blogger Buddy Larsen said...

We could get back to those 70s cars and "planned obsolescence" (AKA "deliberate junk").

3/12/2006 08:44:00 AM  
Blogger Bob Smith said...

Buddy,

I am not opposed to globalization - an equivalent futility to opposing technology and evolution, both of which are stimulating.

I do object to the 'cavalier cowboy' who sees only the benefit and not the liability. Unions, obviously have imploded from an inability to self-regulate (nor are they alone re the recent flurry of corporate governance issues to emerge from Las Vegas accounting.)

My 'issues' are regulatory. Free markets have too many consequential edges to fit comfortably within the western notion of civilized society. I believe in mixed economies which implies tension between the engine and the gas pedal. I also believe that the debate is being deliberately skewed to leverage the public relations derived from benefits while minizing the liabilities that parallel the globalization track.

3/12/2006 09:57:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


Powered by Blogger