Seek and Ye Shall Seek
Why haven't we caught Osama Bin Laden? asks New Jersey Democratic Congressman Robert Andrews. Why haven't the UN and NATO caught Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic and his chief military commander, Ratko Mladic asks Former Spook.
There are probably lots of reasons. And not all of them obvious.
Nothing follows.
posted by wretchardthecat at 7/12/2007 07:36:00 PM
2 Comments:
The answer is obvious. We haven't caught bin Laden because he is in Pakistan, and protected by it's nukes.
If we want bin Laden we will have to accept nuclear war with Pakistan. Which is very likely inevitable once Musharraf proves to be a mortal man when his luck runs out (what, five or six known assassination attempts?)
Bin Laden and Musharraf are in the NWF Province. Protected by Pakistan's military and tribes in that region. To get him out would require probably about 3-4K US dead in a fairly massive operation equal to the Invasion of Iraq (the area is smaller, but extremely mountainous and favorable to the defense). Among other things it's so high helicopters have a hard time operating, and are extremely vulnerable to ground fire from neighboring peaks.
Civilian casualties just from the operations in and around NWF Province would probably total in the 100-200K range. Possibly higher.
And of course Pakistan would not sit idly by. Any operation in NWF Province would have to be preceded by strikes on Pakistan's nuclear missile facilities, to prevent against attack on our forces their or their support bases in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Which given their hardened state from Indian attack, means a nuclear first strike. Which would kill millions of civilians.
We'll do all this anyone once we lose several cities, but hey Liberals were sure they were much much smarter. Already they are talking about recognizing and "negotiating" with bin Laden.
Joe Biden floated a "hypothetical" to his supporters in 2005, that we knew bin Laden was in Pakistan, it would cost X amount of US and civilian casualties to get him. To a man his supporters said "forget about it."
It's obvious where bin Laden is. It's obvious how to get him: kill millions of Pakistanis and get him.
It would all be for a waste anyway since Liberals and Dems demand Miranda rights for terrorists including bin Laden. Howard Dean doesn't want to "prejudge him" and presumes he's innocent of 9/11.
Bin Laden is dead...has been dead for quite a while now. But big deal...there are still millions more to go. Then once we finish them up we can start on the surrender brigade.
Who will be the first democrat to offer terms of peace to Bin Gone?
Posted on January 19th, 2006 in General.
First of all I don’t believe that its Osama Bin Gone. Second of all even if its not him it is a reasonable facimile of him which brings me to wonder, which Democrat will offer to surrende…oops offer a truce first? Will be yeeaaaaaahhhh Howard Dean? Will it be Senator Reid? Which one of those spineless traitors will be on CNN wondering if President Bush should outright reject that bastards offer of peace?
Lets have a poll on the question eh?
hehe..Poll closed because I happen to want to fly with these results since I agree with them! Absolutely no doubt that at one point or the other all the Democrats will all surrender. Jus a matter of time.
Answers Votes Percent
1. Hillary “Me So Horny for Whitehouse” Clinton 6 7%
2. Senator John “Btw served in Vietnam” Kerry 16 18%
3. Senator Harry Reid 3 3%
4. Howard Yeaaaaaggghhh Dean 16 18%
5. All of the Democrats will bend over and smile! 50 55%
Post a Comment
<< Home