Sunday, October 29, 2006

It's true. Honest.

Robert Fisk suggests that Israel used "a secret new uranium-based weapon in southern Lebanon this summer in the 34-day assault that cost more than 1,300 Lebanese lives, most of them civilians". (Hat tip Tim Blair)

Wow. Just imagine how many secret atomic bombs it would have taken to kill 655,000 Iraqis as proved by Lancet since it took 34 days of nonstop bombing to kill 1,300 Lebanese with Jewish nuclear weapons. This is the amazing thing about news stories which by constant repetition have become fact. America and the Jews have all these horrifying weapons, yet despite their brutal use over extended periods they have absolutely failed to hit any significant numbers of the enemy and only succeed in killing children, kittens and Red Cross ambulances. Against incompetents like America, the Keystone Cops would have succeeded long ago.

9 Comments:

Blogger The Anti-Jihadist said...

That's "Zionist" nuclear weapons. Be more careful with your idiotarian ranting rhetoric next time!

10/29/2006 03:36:00 PM  
Blogger Coach Mark said...

al Qaeda leader in Iraq working to unseat Republicans in upcoming election?

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,20659037-5001028,00.html

10/29/2006 04:12:00 PM  
Blogger William Tyroler said...

Ballistic Bob Fisk, it will be recalled, skulked for years about Lebanon, blind to the tens of thousands of missiles being stockpiled by Hezbollah for use against the Jews:

... The missiles are a myth – I travel the roads of southern Lebanon every two weeks and there are no such missiles, as the UN force there will confirm – but this doesn't matter. And then it will be Libya who has the most sophisticated C-B weapons. Or Saudi Arabia. Or anyone else Israel wants attacked.

10/29/2006 04:28:00 PM  
Blogger Asher Abrams said...

I was under the impression that depleted uranium had been used in weapons for quite some time.

10/29/2006 06:06:00 PM  
Blogger Deuce ☂ said...

Robert Fisk suffers from congenital impacted bile. He is full of shit.

Israel was assaulted by thousands of Iranian supplied rockets. C-4 often advocates a more robust and brutal use of military power in dealing with sworn and demonstrable enemies. Thousand of rockets assaulting civilian areas should represent an adequate demonstration of hostile intent. It seems to me Israel applied the C-4 solution to dealing with enemies.

The client of Iran, Hezbollah, is the enemy common to both the US and Israel. Let Iran clean up the cluster bombs and let the Lebanese learn a lesson that bad decisions have consequences.

10/29/2006 06:28:00 PM  
Blogger sam said...

The New York Daily News reported in its April 3d edition that an investigation launched by the paper found that four GIs returning from Iraq are “contaminated with radiation likely caused by dust from depleted uranium shells fired by U.S. troops.” All four of the soldiers are from the 442d Military Police Company, and were previously stationed in the vicinity of Samawah, Iraq.

A nuclear medicine expert, Dr. Asaf Duracovic, examined and tested nine soldiers from the company, and says that four “almost certainly” inhaled radioactive dust from exploded American shells manufactured with depleted uranium. He also stated that “These are amazing results, especially since these soldiers were military police not exposed to the heat of battle.”

And indeed they are amazing, considering the newspaper account of the soldiers’ illnesses, and the discussions of the ammunition itself are fraught with half-truths and errors.

One of the most glaring omissions by Dr. Duracovic and his colleagues is that they fail to explain how a substance that is less radioactive than natural uranium can be labeled as “radioactive weapons.” By way of comparison, DU’s radioactivity is so low, that a single piece weighing 6,615 pounds would be needed to obtain one curie of radioactivity.


Depleted Uranium: The Saga Continues

10/29/2006 06:35:00 PM  
Blogger Teresita said...

Saddam began circulating propaganda that it was causing sick Iraqi kids and the leftie and anti-nuke MSM ran with the ball.

The primary objection to DU penetrator rounds is that they work as advertised.

10/29/2006 08:41:00 PM  
Blogger Deuce ☂ said...

C-4,Your three points:

1. Perhaps.

2. Israeli enemies make no distinction between civilian and military targets, in fact they prefer soft civilian targets as the direct attack on the Israeli military usually ends with some unusually unpleasant consequences.

The Arab and Islamic enemies of Israel also work from civilian areas. They do that for tactical reasons and the they use it as a strategy for propoganda purposes. Look at the world hysteria when Israel kills civilians, as an adjunct to military activity, as opposed to the Arab tactic of making the civilians targets. How would Defense Minister C-4 handle that? I know how Defense Minister 2164th would do it and I still have my foreskin. Israel is far more restrained than any of the US Allies were when they were in an existential struggle during WWII.

3. A retreat by an enemy does not constitute a surrender. It is a hostile enemy army heading in the opposite direction usually to survive and kill you tomorrow. Apply the C-4, 2164th Minister of Defense test. What do you think? I have my move worked out and it would not be throwing them a Good Bye Party.

10/30/2006 03:27:00 AM  
Blogger slimslowslider said...

The Noble 2164th vs the Ignoble Cedarfart. Gotta love it.

"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic"

Cedarfart's favorite quote and words he lives by (when it comes to Israel).

10/30/2006 06:32:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Powered by Blogger